|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
Total Votes |
335 |
Average Score |
6.66 |
Verdict |
Rice
|
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=9033 |
|
Comments: 8 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 08-07-2002
|
View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
Description:
here's the deal. you pay some guy at a "preformance shop" $400.00 for a piece of
plastic that gets mounted to your car. in return. you get poor gas mileage and
reduced traction.
. i guess it makes sence. |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
|
#1 |
8-28-2002 @ 04:56:01 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Actually, if you put a stock back bumper on this it would look okay. That wing is pushing it a bit, but it's not intollerable. |
|
#2 |
9-07-2002 @ 10:55:56 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
....and why is it that everything Andy's Ricer Sport makes has the word "combat" in it? |
|
#3 |
2-10-2003 @ 09:37:35 PM |
Posted By : v8stang02 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
why didnt they jus go for the stock itr wing...it looks sooo much better than that thing |
|
#4 |
9-15-2003 @ 11:05:47 AM |
Posted By : 91RegalGS |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Because they want to be "MaD tYTe aND DIffeREnT", just like everyone else. |
|
#5 |
10-01-2003 @ 10:08:35 AM |
Posted By : SuperCivic |
Reply | Edit | Del |
got me #2 but the car could be alot worse. the wing is ok. |
|
#6 |
2-13-2004 @ 06:16:45 PM |
Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
So... hows the poor gas mileage factor in? |
|
#8 |
2-13-2004 @ 06:30:23 PM |
Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Because its SO unaerodynamic. Im not defending wings in general, but at sub-racing speeds, it cant make much difference. |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|