|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
327 |
| Average Score |
7.68 |
| Verdict |
Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=9305 |
|
| Comments: 25 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 08-12-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
No description |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #1 |
8-12-2002 @ 01:22:12 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
From the owner: I bought this GTI in mid September of '99. I originally had bought a 1989 Suzuki Swift 1.3L GL, I drove that for almost a year dreaming of owning a GTI someday. While testing all of my 80HP(70HP stock) I wrote off the car(rear ended a FORD heh) and bussed everywhere for about 3 months till I found my GTI.
My very 1st car was a 1986 Mazda 626 LX TURBO! WOW, could that thing ever go! Give my GTI a good run for it's money. I bought my '94 Swift from Suzuki of Ottawa over the phone with my VISA, with out even seeing it! I was determined to own a GTI, it turned out to be a 1994 Swift GT(Last year manufactured in NorthAmerica) which was cool. My next step was to modify it, little did I know this was impossible. Where I live here in Ottawa it's very hard to find parts, so I went to Speedstyle here in Ottawa and they made a custom intake with a K&N air filter for my car The rest I did myself or came with the car when I bought it."
What a wanker.
|
|
| #2 |
8-12-2002 @ 01:24:10 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Wanker defined - Guy who's proud he wrote-off his first car in a rear-ender
|
|
| #3 |
8-12-2002 @ 01:24:11 PM |
| Posted By : ginsu417 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Oh how I love Suzuki Swift tuners. Like a bleeding hemorhoid.
|
|
| #4 |
8-12-2002 @ 01:25:29 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2: How do you rear-end somebody with a car that only makes 70hp? I would think that'd take a concerted effort.
|
|
| #5 |
8-12-2002 @ 01:26:45 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
This poor thing was rebadged for sale as a GEO in the US through GM, those things were factory hoop, underpowered, even for somthing that weighs as much as a couple cinder blocks, and now we've got idiots who think they are performance cars, yay 70HP! that's exatcly 58 more HP than my lawnmower
[Edited by Low-Tech Redneck on 8-12-2002 @ 01:27:03 PM]
|
|
| #6 |
8-12-2002 @ 01:27:43 PM |
| Posted By : ginsu417 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Damn, whats in your lawnmower? A Civic motor? ;)
|
|
| #8 |
8-12-2002 @ 01:28:37 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i just love how they named something with 80hp Swift, so in ricers minds if it sounds fast it must be fast
|
|
| #9 |
8-12-2002 @ 01:30:43 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Actualy, it's a sears craftsman riding mower, the prevous owner was an idiot and a cheapskate. He filled it with 2 cycle engine oil because it was cheaper to buy and though he was being clever, one blown engine later, he threw it out, we took it, put a 12 hp Murray Tecumseh engine in and kept using it
|
|
| #11 |
8-12-2002 @ 02:30:07 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
This guy is hilarious...and I LOVE how ricers add their motor type to the side of their car. I see Hondas with "1.8 liter sohc" on the side...or a del sol with "102 h.p." on the back. This guy has a "twin cam 16 valve", SO IMTIMIDATING. They love to copy off of American cars that say things like "5.9 liter V8" or "5.0", hahahaha, wanker is a perfect description.
|
|
| #12 |
8-12-2002 @ 02:31:10 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
He can't even park that shoebox between the lines...no wonder he rear-ended someone with his 80HP lawnmower without blades.
|
|
| #14 |
8-12-2002 @ 02:32:54 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
well in his defense the other car is parked outside of its space so this guy would have had to park outside his as well
|
|
| #15 |
8-12-2002 @ 02:34:17 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13, yeah the Volkswagen GTi.
#14 - his buddy with the ricey Eclipse? My point is still valid.
|
|
| #16 |
8-12-2002 @ 02:35:31 PM |
| Posted By : ginsu417 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Well, at least this car actually has the twin cam 16 valve engine and not the SOHC 1.0L 3 cylinder base one. Not that .3L of displacement is going to make much of a difference at speeds over 25.
|
|
| #17 |
8-12-2002 @ 02:39:19 PM |
| Posted By : ginsu417 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
If you put a cadillac northstar V8 in the back of this, it'd be one hell of a sleeper. Don't know how you'd keep the front end down, though.
|
|
| #19 |
8-12-2002 @ 02:41:37 PM |
| Posted By : ginsu417 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't think they'd fit under the hood. You could barely squeeze mini-me under there...
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
