|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
385 |
| Average Score |
2.94 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=10087 |
|
| Comments: 32 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 08-27-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Dodge Charger Daytona 500
Engine: V8
Engine location: Front, longitudinally mounted
Displacement: 7.206 liter / 439.7 cu in
Aspiration: Naturally Aspirated
Drive: Rear wheel drive
Power: 420 bhp / 313.3 kW
BHP/Liter: 58.3
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #21 |
9-05-2002 @ 11:55:05 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
They only made a couple of hundred Charger 500s, I think. They made about 1500 Daytonas. I'll find out tomorrow morning (I've got a book, but I don't feel like rooting around in my dark storage building to find it) and post it on here.
[Edited by Skid on 9-05-2002 @ 11:56:19 PM]
|
|
| #22 |
9-06-2002 @ 12:12:37 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Okay, it was 392 Charger 500s built in '69 (67 had Hemis), and 503 Charger Daytonas built in '69 (around 70 had Hemis).
|
|
| #26 |
9-06-2002 @ 12:20:37 AM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Skid, I just verified your count, according to Chrysler Corp. itself, 503 Charger Daytonas were built, in various forms (HEMI powered w/ manual being the rarest)
However, others say that due to incomplete records and other problems in assigning VIN's, as many as 560 or as few as 386 may have been built, the real answer is no one knows for sure, but certainly somewhere near the 500 mark
[Edited by Low-Tech Redneck on 9-06-2002 @ 12:24:01 AM]
|
|
| #27 |
9-06-2002 @ 12:23:23 AM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Oh, and at last count, 385 Charger Daytonas have been registered as exsisting in some form at some place in the world
|
|
| #28 |
10-17-2002 @ 12:57:00 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The real question is why this guy sprang for a Charger Daytona but not a Hemi to go with it.
|
|
| #29 |
12-21-2002 @ 11:28:54 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#28, Well, the Hemi would cost you an extra $1000, the 440 was a cheaper engine that wasn't a whole lot worse at all
|
|
| #30 |
12-24-2002 @ 10:38:24 PM |
| Posted By : Lt.Doomsday |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It's a Damn Charger Daytona.They had one on e-bay that was all rusted out,but had numbers matching motor and tranny and it was going for $39,000
|
|
| #31 |
12-24-2002 @ 10:40:34 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#30, Sounds about right. Especially if it was a Hemi.
Welcome to Riceornot, BTW.
[Edited by Skid on 12-24-2002 @ 10:41:31 PM]
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
