|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
227 |
| Average Score |
2.75 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=12050 |
|
| Comments: 11 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 10-02-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
nice ass stang |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #1 |
10-02-2002 @ 05:15:47 PM |
| Posted By : blackcat77 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
So he's saying he put a 427 into a '65 Mustang, right? Otherwise, that stripe ain't right. And if the stripe is right, then the emblem on the fender isn't.
(Yeah, I know -- picky, picky, picky. But I have respect for classic cars...)
[Edited by blackcat77 on 10-02-2002 @ 05:18:10 PM]
|
|
| #5 |
10-02-2002 @ 10:36:03 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, It's basically impossible to put a big block into an early Mustang. All the first generations would actually ride noticeably lower in the front if they had a big block, the suspensions were never designed for that much weight up front. And the "V" emblem (in this case, signifying a 289) doesn't exactly match with the "GT500" logo.
|
|
| #6 |
10-02-2002 @ 10:36:04 PM |
| Posted By : no1camaro |
Reply | Edit | Del |
hmmm the front wheel looks bigger then the back wheel
|
|
| #7 |
10-02-2002 @ 10:36:50 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
'67s were (I believe) the first instance of factory big block mustangs, and that took more than a little work.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
