|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=18667 |
|
| Comments: 12 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-10-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
I want! |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #4 |
5-16-2004 @ 05:07:48 AM |
| Posted By : V8Tbird |
Reply | Edit | Del |
thats cool, see a little car like that make a bunch of smoke
|
|
| #5 |
12-14-2004 @ 02:05:09 AM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
fast k cars ARE the ultimate sleeper. people have less suspcions about a souless 80's econobox than a 60's family car.
|
|
| #8 |
6-08-2005 @ 10:55:15 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, I'm not sure but I assume they aren't since they were introduced before the K-cars.
|
|
| #10 |
6-08-2005 @ 10:58:43 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, Might as well. Just about every other FWD Chrysler of the 80s was a K-car.
|
|
| #12 |
8-09-2005 @ 02:33:59 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, Correct, although it's the same engine. Chrysler used those big turbo 4s in just about everything for a while.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
