|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=1987 |
|
| Comments: 37 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 03-13-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
If you have to ask who's car this is, you've been living in a cave son. |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #21 |
4-27-2002 @ 12:16:48 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
301 Turbos were incredibly lame.
|
|
| #22 |
4-27-2002 @ 12:21:21 PM |
| Posted By : 500plus |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The turbo was the same one used on the Ford 2.3 liter 4 cyl. of the day. It was WAAAAY too small for a 301 V8. Basically the restriction it placed in the exhaust stole as much power as it added thus negating the advantag of the turbo. Also the exhaust system on these cars was so restrictive it took about 75 horses just to shove the exhaust out the back! When these were new I raced one from a 30 mph roll with my worn out 283 powerglide and beat it! Now is THAT pathetic or what??
|
|
| #24 |
7-18-2002 @ 12:37:46 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I haven't seen S&tB 2 yet. But I want this car. I had an '80. I miss it.
|
|
| #25 |
7-18-2002 @ 01:08:19 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The movie PALED im comparisson to the first, but it had a few funny car-goes-though-large-stationary-object gags
|
|
| #26 |
7-18-2002 @ 01:13:39 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Sequels almost always suck. Except Cannonball Run. They could make a hundred of them and with that cast, they'd be funny. The 301 was ONLY built to be a light engine. If you check out the parts, the were all designed to save weight. Which, of course, hurt power. But the 301 in my '80 was pretty quick. I wouldn't go braggin' about it or revvin' like crazy on a new one, but it was quick.
|
|
| #27 |
7-18-2002 @ 01:26:30 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The 301 was a good engine, but it was the TURBO verisons of them that really sucked because they were not well designed, they sapped power and lagged badly,
|
|
| #32 |
8-10-2002 @ 12:37:49 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
So, who wants the bike (lower left hand corner)? I've got the 'Bird.
|
|
| #33 |
8-10-2002 @ 12:38:38 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#31: ??? It has a showroom finish! What more could you want?
|
|
| #34 |
8-10-2002 @ 12:39:34 PM |
| Posted By : Ponch |
Reply | Edit | Del |
if it had red trim it could almost be mistaken for the old batmobile
|
|
| #35 |
3-17-2003 @ 07:13:13 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
saw one today but it was silver with a black bird
|
|
| #36 |
7-30-2004 @ 11:03:47 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I liked it when they destroyed the Roller-Coaster
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
