Go to car

Latest Comments
Car: 97076   By: DiRF   Comment: "...not exactly the most graceful heckblende......"
Car: 90281   By: Obsidian   Comment: "Regardless - logos and emblems shouldn't be illumi..."
Car: 90281   By: Low-Tech Redneck   Comment: "Sure it's minimalist, compared to a manhole lid...."
Car: 90281   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "Vulgar is a Mercedes with the optional illuminated..."
Car: 46922   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "If you'd rather just give the money directly to me..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Bling Bling
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images


Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List




Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password

View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.

Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=21514
Submitted by: AutobahnRacer
Comments: 34  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 1  (View)
Submitted on: 04-13-2003
View Stats Category: Car
Fast And The Furious 2 Supra.


Showing page: 2 of 2
1 2 ]

6-05-2003 @ 01:11:45 AM
Posted By : Bling24 Reply | Edit | Del
#20, meh I'm not paying for it

6-05-2003 @ 04:10:00 AM
Posted By : emaretu Reply | Edit | Del
all the cars in 2f2f are dam slow then there are stock most all ran mid 14s i was like wtf the lancer evo ran like low 15s lol i was like what the hell did they do to those cars to make them run slower esp with the mods they have

6-15-2003 @ 07:51:39 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Anyone seen 2F2F yet? I've heard it's better than the original: Of course, the only reason the original was even mildly enjoyable is because it was so bad. Therefore I'm not sure if 2F2F being better is a good thing or not.

6-15-2003 @ 07:54:18 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#23, aye, tis better and not near as bad as I expected

6-15-2003 @ 07:54:57 PM
Posted By : Bling24 Reply | Edit | Del
#23, it is but they to rely on plot TOO much

7-16-2003 @ 07:11:27 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
The only modified car SCC tested was the Supra. All the cars (except the yenko) were down on power, which is why they ran slower than stock. Not surprising considering the abuse they probably had.

Regarding their "bashing" of the Yenko replica: They really liked it, if you actually read it. They considered it the most fun car there. And they have a point about all the rattles and shit, you know. There have been a few advancements since the late 60s.

7-16-2003 @ 07:13:27 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
To clarify the above post: SCC tested the most authentic of all the major cars from 2F2F that they could get. All except the Supra were mechanically stock. The supra just had a single-turbo conversion.

9-23-2004 @ 09:11:38 PM
Posted By : Tastycakemix Reply | Edit | Del
That thing looks happy.

It doesn't look bad to me.

12-14-2004 @ 01:25:36 PM
Posted By : 91TSI Reply | Edit | Del
I'm not sure how I feel about this car. It's deffiantely rice. But it's a supra. Decisions decisions.... um I'm still gonna have to go with a 10 only because of what it stands for and all the rice fanboys out there that rally behind it. Without the graphics and wing it wouldn't be SO bad. I could deal with the color even.

::votes 10::

1-25-2005 @ 01:34:10 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del

[Edited by 427 Vette on 1-25-2005 @ 01:34:39 AM]

9-14-2005 @ 08:44:45 PM
Posted By : Officer Dick Reply | Edit | Del
It's been over 3 years and their still licencing the hell out of this orange marketing turd.

1-18-2009 @ 06:00:59 PM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
It's typical for ricer cars to make less power than stock, even if they have 5 grand mods. Why? Because ricers will just throw on random shit, they never heard about building an engine using a dyno.

[Edited by Sensekhmet on 1-18-2009 @ 06:04:39 PM]

1-18-2009 @ 06:25:58 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#32, Ricer: "Yeah, I'm gonna do a single turbo conversion for my Supra! It'll have 600 horsepower!"
Me: "Um, you do realize you can make 600 horsepower out of a twin turbo setup, right? And not have the huge turbo lag endemic of one large turbo?"
Ricer: "........"

1-18-2009 @ 06:37:51 PM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
#33, So we know that ricers fail to grasp how you cannot build a good engine on your parents driveway, but they also fail to grasp the concept of reliability. Like that guy that argued with me that you can get 500hp out of Honda 1.6l for 100s of miles.
Yeah, back in the 80s Renault did get 1500hp out of a 1.5l F1 engine... for 3 laps.

Showing page: 2 of 2
1 2 ]

Login to leave a comment

Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, November 16, 2018 08:41:38 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2018 Ricecop. All rights reserved.