Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 95884   By: Skid   Comment: "Someone released Mulholland Drive as a track....11..."
Car: 98674   By: Skid   Comment: "Given the very low point Trans Ams performance was..."
Car: 98675   By: Skid   Comment: "I'm forever on the hunt for the XK140 dropheads th..."
Car: 98673   By: Skid   Comment: "Now THAT is a cool find. I love the British Fords..."
Car: 43287   By: Skid   Comment: "Whoo boy, there's a memory......"
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=25740
Submitted by: kstagger
Comments: 19  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 07-26-2003
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
anyone need a project car? Just think - a built 351, or 460... tubbed rear with a nice Ford 9"...


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
7-26-2003 @ 04:42:50 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
kinda reminds me of our old one. Had a 6 cyl, but it scooted pretty well.

#2
7-26-2003 @ 04:47:52 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Reminds me of those Christian "Help support a third world child" commercials...dunno why...

#3
1-04-2004 @ 10:31:47 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
This is a Maverick, right?

#4
1-04-2004 @ 10:34:41 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#3, aye

#5
1-04-2004 @ 10:52:05 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
A '74, IINM.

#6
1-04-2004 @ 10:54:59 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#5, IINM = If I N___ M____?

[Edited by DiRF on 1-04-2004 @ 10:55:42 PM]


#7
1-04-2004 @ 11:03:46 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#6, Not Mistaken.

#8
1-04-2004 @ 11:10:24 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#7, Ah. Never seen that Acronymn before...

#9
1-05-2004 @ 01:13:25 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#8, Well me neither, honestly, I just made that one up. I figured I'd just throw it in, since I use that phrase quite a bit and acronyms are shorter.

#10
1-05-2004 @ 01:19:55 PM
Posted By : 91TSI Reply | Edit | Del
I have a friend who has a 72 with a built 351 under the hood. Last summer it ran 13.2 all motor. (with a full roll cage)

#11
1-05-2004 @ 01:21:33 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#10, Traction issues?

#12
1-05-2004 @ 01:22:57 PM
Posted By : 91TSI Reply | Edit | Del
Not really. Tubbed.

#13
1-05-2004 @ 01:24:13 PM
Posted By : 91TSI Reply | Edit | Del
That was the first run. The second run that day, the tranny blew so it came home on the roll back.

The car is really heavy. It has a full interior. (minus the back seat obviously) and the roll cage. Stock glass and everything.

[Edited by 91TSI on 1-05-2004 @ 01:28:51 PM]


#14
5-20-2004 @ 02:38:47 AM
Posted By : Biohazard Reply | Edit | Del
My friend has one of these for sale. The tranny died on it. Comes with 302 motor mounts. Beautiful condition in light blue. Darker blue interior. All flawless. $1300

#15
5-20-2004 @ 02:41:21 AM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
The Maverick/Comet gets no love........ probably the curse of the Pinto and all the cars that shared it's chassis OR any similar styling

#16
5-20-2004 @ 02:42:57 AM
Posted By : Biohazard Reply | Edit | Del
#15, The main advantage is that they are really light weight. (about 2500lbs) The main disadvantage is the suspension. (loose as hell)

#17
6-30-2005 @ 03:06:37 AM
Posted By : Big Lan Reply | Edit | Del
#15, Actually, the Pinto is a totally different chassis AFAIK. The Maverick/Comet is based on the Falcon chassis, just like the Mustang, Cougar, Granada, Monarch, Versailles, and probably some other shit I forgot.

#18
3-02-2008 @ 08:52:32 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#17, I know the Granada and Maverick shared a platform, but I don't think it was related to the Mustang, and only the '80-'82 Cougar, as far as I know.

[Edited by Skid on 3-02-2008 @ 08:53:20 AM]


#19
7-20-2020 @ 12:11:04 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#18, Let me correct you, Me From Twelve Years in the Past: The Granada and Maverick are both built on the same platform that was introduced in 1960 as the Falcon, which spawned both the 1965-1973 Mustang and the 1967-1973 Cougar.

And the 1980-1982 Cougar was a Fox body.

[Edited by Skid on 7-20-2020 @ 12:11:33 PM]


Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, April 19, 2024 10:31:23 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.