Go to car

Latest Comments
Car: 97009   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Wait. Does it have the M-Sport pack? It's odd to s..."
Car: 96997   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "The hell is it doing way out there?..."
Car: 97010   By: Skid   Comment: "1968 SST. This would be something well worth havin..."
Car: 97009   By: Skid   Comment: "Strange that he kept the Pacifica. What role will ..."
Car: 48140   By: DiRF   Comment: "I was happy that the "SR-20" JDM plate I had on my..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Bling Bling
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images


Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List




Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password

View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.

Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=29124
Submitted by: UFO2020
Comments: 29  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 12-23-2003
View Stats Category: Photoshop/Art
Check it out guys, it's a drawing of the 2005 Chevy Cobalt. If this car is not successful, GM may be out of the small car business. So, what do you think?


Showing page: 1 of 2
1 2 ]

12-23-2003 @ 07:57:27 PM
Posted By : SuperDave479 Reply | Edit | Del
I like it a lot better than the Cavy from these pics. Let's hope it turns out as good-looking on the street.

12-23-2003 @ 08:18:11 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
another crappy car disgracing the SS badge

12-23-2003 @ 09:42:49 PM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
"Instead of a normal 4 cylinder, its got a small v6!!"

12-23-2003 @ 09:44:52 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#3, With around 30 more horsepower than the normal four cylinder.

12-23-2003 @ 11:59:16 PM
Posted By : camino83 Reply | Edit | Del
SS means nothing these days...granted they at least didn't put it on the cavy. Then i'd have to shoot someone. "yo mang, i just gots me a cavy SS wit dat massive 4-banger!"

12-24-2003 @ 12:28:07 AM
Posted By : UFO2020 Reply | Edit | Del
I think this car looks very nice, better than all cars in the compact car segment. It's very sporty, and you don't see taillights like that everyday. This could become a hot tuner car.

12-24-2003 @ 12:29:39 AM
Posted By : Phantom1 Reply | Edit | Del
#6, We must not let that happen.

12-24-2003 @ 12:38:42 AM
Posted By : UFO2020 Reply | Edit | Del
"It is already well documented that the SS will get the 2.0L supercharged ecotec - claimed 200hp. This engine goes into production for this upcoming model year (2004) so no doubt the mags will be able to get their hands on them in the coming months and we can see what its really got. Now the only quesion is, where is the 2.4L Ecotec (170hp) going to fit into the Cobalt lineup." - Dave (j-body.org webmaster)

12-24-2003 @ 12:53:24 AM
Posted By : camino83 Reply | Edit | Del
#6, the taillights actually remind me of a cougar but not as bad. i think its the circular size differences. anyways, yes if it looks like a honda had mad sex with a cougar then it will be a hot tuner item. chevy's sellin out :( oh wait...that happened when the first 6cyl was named SS. No i'm not saying the 6cyl is a bad engine, but come on...at least save the name for something with more than 200hp. :

[Edited by camino83 on 12-24-2003 @ 12:57:05 AM]

12-24-2003 @ 09:15:40 AM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#9, and has 8 holes in the engine block

12-24-2003 @ 09:18:42 AM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#6, yeah chevy has never used pairs of round taillights before......oh wait. sorry but like the cavy, this is just another souless econobox

12-24-2003 @ 11:17:53 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
#5, yeah, there was NEVER an ss cavalier, right?

12-24-2003 @ 11:20:03 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
anyway, i like the previous gen cavalier better, it looks so clean and simple, and the 2.4 wasnt a bad engine

12-24-2003 @ 01:24:58 PM
Posted By : UFO2020 Reply | Edit | Del
#11, Where we stand in the year 2003 (almost 2004), there are very few cars on the road with dual round taillights. The Corvette is the only other car I can think of (the new Impala doesn't count because the tails are just one big piece going across the back of the car). Seeing these lights on a compact is a first, at least in this country.

This car is on the Delta platform, same as the Saturn Ion. Some people complain that it's too heavy, partially due to extra steel used to meet government safety regulations. The SS model of the Cobalt will likely get 4-wheel disc brakes (like the Ion Redline) but no IRS. The Redline also has a 6-speed tranny with LSD so that may appear on the Cobalt too.

This car will be offered in 2-door coupe and 4-door sedan body styles with 8 trim levels. All models will use 4-cylinder Ecotec engines. The 2.2L offers 140hp, the 2.4L 170hp, and the 2.0L S/C 200hp.

[Edited by UFO2020 on 12-24-2003 @ 01:28:02 PM]

12-24-2003 @ 10:26:47 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
I'd own one!

12-24-2003 @ 10:45:27 PM
Posted By : Phantom1 Reply | Edit | Del
#15, Yea I wouldnt mind having one either

12-25-2003 @ 10:15:29 AM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
I think it should be this- SS = no less than 350ci...

Now if they had a V6 with a 350ci displacement.. holy crap thatd be a big V6... :ponders the possibilities:

[Edited by MxCx on 12-25-2003 @ 10:16:15 AM]

12-25-2003 @ 10:59:04 PM
Posted By : SuperDave479 Reply | Edit | Del
SS, maybe not. 200HP out of a car a little bigger than a Cavy that looks like this=winnar

12-25-2003 @ 11:19:29 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#17, I don't know, the 327 in the Impala SS had a bit of scoot to it.

Assuming they keep these pretty simple, they might make a good entry-level performance car. I'd take one over a Neon SRT-4, since I prefer superchargers to turbochargers and these aren't as goofy-looking. The HP seems pretty close, no gap a few bolt ons wouldn't close.

12-26-2003 @ 01:57:37 AM
Posted By : camino83 Reply | Edit | Del
#19, i agree with ya on the taking this over the srt-4 thing. that car just looks odd to me, not sure why. this one doesn't look too bad at all for a smaller car and i'm sure it'd be fun to drive after a few updates to the engine. only problem I have with it is the ss badge, but thats not much of a problem considering i love the monte ss even tho they're underpowered and fwd (2 things i dislike in a car ;)) but i'd definitely take one if i was in that market.

Showing page: 1 of 2
1 2 ]

Login to leave a comment

Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 07:40:29 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2018 Ricecop. All rights reserved.