Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 63801   By: Skid   Comment: "It's a pretty great casting, really. I do enjoy di..."
Car: 63801   By: DiRF   Comment: "Well, apparently, Astros were popular/well-known e..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: ""Mutton chops, m'lord?"..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Oh, Å akasurameÅ¡, will you ever learn?..."
Car: 57093   By: DiRF   Comment: "I don't imagine a mid-engined is the easiest to dr..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 590
Average Score 3.16
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=2975
Submitted by: AC Schnitzer M3
Comments: 15  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 04-02-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Bugatti EB 118 concept, had a W18 in it, 555.0 bhp @ 4800 rpm, 479.4 ft lbs @ 4000
rpm, went 198 stock, sweet ass car


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
4-13-2002 @ 03:49:18 PM
Posted By : 4n-Sucks Reply | Edit | Del
It's lacking in the looks department but i love the 555 hp

#2
4-15-2002 @ 03:20:34 AM
Posted By : cams116 Reply | Edit | Del
And the W18 idea is cool. However it works.

#3
5-12-2002 @ 08:18:36 PM
Posted By : locofive0 Reply | Edit | Del
i still like the bugatti EB veyron 16/4 better--1001 stock hp, 920 ft-lbs torque (i think, correct me if i'm wrong)

#4
5-12-2002 @ 08:21:02 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
This acutaly doesn't look bad

#5
7-28-2002 @ 08:49:23 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Very classy for a supercar.

#6
8-04-2002 @ 01:21:54 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
HEY GUYS!! Here ya go, this is uglier than most of the GMs out now. And Fords have always been uglier.

#7
8-04-2002 @ 01:22:40 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
I don't hate it too much, but it is kinda boring.

#8
8-04-2002 @ 01:23:07 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
Its not that bad looking, but that price that engine and that color make it looks like crap on a stick

#9
8-04-2002 @ 01:23:20 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
I've seen this, and I like it (see comment #4) and Ford may have been uglier, but I'm liking the new mustang concepts, whereas every single concept from GM makes me want to puke

#10
8-04-2002 @ 01:24:16 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
This thing got it's front end beat to shit with the ugly stick. Just like that godawful Focus piece of shit.

#11
8-04-2002 @ 01:24:44 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
I dunno what's with the latest "retro" design craze, either. Seems like every automaker just mixes funky angles and curves, sticks one or two styling cues from a classic on the car, and calls it "retro".

#12
8-04-2002 @ 01:30:00 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
This thing is retro dogshit. Half the designers out there have no idea what retro is.

#13
8-04-2002 @ 01:32:46 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
#9 Even I have to admit the Bel-Air concept is a fuckin' horrible disgrace to the name. Worse than the '80s LeMans and the new Malibu put together. And how the fuck do you build a Bel-Air without fins??!! Please, tell me!! Have you seen that bastardized shitball?

#14
7-18-2004 @ 10:23:16 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
BOWING!

#15
8-26-2004 @ 01:03:09 AM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
Looks like a real Bugatti, more than I can say for the VWeyron.

[Edited by thirtyseven on 8-26-2004 @ 01:03:21 AM]


Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, May 9, 2024 08:30:54 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.