Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 97661   By: Skid   Comment: "They're not the worst, but there are quite a few w..."
Car: 97661   By: DiRF   Comment: "They're like polished, oversized versions of what ..."
Car: 97661   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "those wheels are awful, especially on here...."
Car: 33317   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Before the Ineos Grenadier, there was this. I reme..."
Car: 97492   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "To be fair, I never understood the hate. Every per..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=30120
Submitted by: ambientFLIER
Comments: 11  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 02-06-2004
View Stats Category: Truck
Description:
toyota tacoma x-runner, featuring toyota's new 4.0-liter V6 with 250hp and 270lb-ft and a 6-speed...0-60 in less than 7, and more than 0.90 on the skidpad


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
2-06-2004 @ 09:49:49 AM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
Omg ford headlights!! nah, j/k. Looks nice

#2
2-06-2004 @ 05:36:38 PM
Posted By : Obsidian Reply | Edit | Del
OMG!!!11 more torque than HP!!!11

RICER!!!!


#3
2-06-2004 @ 05:51:11 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#2, You've got it backwards, there. Unless it's deliberate, in which case ignore this post.

#4
2-07-2004 @ 01:38:36 AM
Posted By : theslowestbeat Reply | Edit | Del
nice ram

#5
2-07-2004 @ 05:18:57 AM
Posted By : Jesuz Reply | Edit | Del
#2, wtf are u talking about? almost all trucks have more torque then HP. and ricer HP is about twice it's torque

but those are just #, it doesnt matter which is higher then which. they are not massured in the same way. lb/f, Kg/m .... dont mean nothing. 1/4 mile time and how much load u can hual are what matter


#6
2-07-2004 @ 12:11:09 PM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
the more i look at it the more i like it

#7
2-07-2004 @ 03:33:34 PM
Posted By : Jesuz Reply | Edit | Del
i wonder how much it costs?

#8
2-09-2004 @ 11:34:17 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Eww...I do no approve the of the new Tacoma headlights. Otherwise, this is very nice.

#9
2-09-2004 @ 11:38:56 AM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
don't like the bed or the lights

#10
2-12-2004 @ 09:15:24 AM
Posted By : SuperDave479 Reply | Edit | Del
#2, Thats a GOOD thing. I have more torque than HP too.

Can anyone say Colorado/Canyon fenderwells?


#11
2-12-2004 @ 09:29:29 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
The torque/HP comparison is stupid, IMHO. HP=TQ*RPM/5252. If your engine continues making significant amounts of torque after 5252 RPM, it will by definition have more HP than torque.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, November 22, 2024 07:01:25 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.