|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=30120 |
|
| Comments: 11 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-06-2004
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Truck |
|
|
Description:
toyota tacoma x-runner, featuring toyota's new 4.0-liter V6 with 250hp and 270lb-ft and a 6-speed...0-60 in less than 7, and more than 0.90 on the skidpad |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #1 |
2-06-2004 @ 09:49:49 AM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Omg ford headlights!! nah, j/k. Looks nice
|
|
| #2 |
2-06-2004 @ 05:36:38 PM |
| Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
OMG!!!11 more torque than HP!!!11
RICER!!!!
|
|
| #3 |
2-06-2004 @ 05:51:11 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, You've got it backwards, there. Unless it's deliberate, in which case ignore this post.
|
|
| #5 |
2-07-2004 @ 05:18:57 AM |
| Posted By : Jesuz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, wtf are u talking about? almost all trucks have more torque then HP. and ricer HP is about twice it's torque
but those are just #, it doesnt matter which is higher then which. they are not massured in the same way. lb/f, Kg/m .... dont mean nothing. 1/4 mile time and how much load u can hual are what matter
|
|
| #10 |
2-12-2004 @ 09:15:24 AM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, Thats a GOOD thing. I have more torque than HP too.
Can anyone say Colorado/Canyon fenderwells?
|
|
| #11 |
2-12-2004 @ 09:29:29 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The torque/HP comparison is stupid, IMHO. HP=TQ*RPM/5252. If your engine continues making significant amounts of torque after 5252 RPM, it will by definition have more HP than torque.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
