Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 98677   By: Skid   Comment: "I think '66 is the only year I like the Caprice ro..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the *only* team o..."
Car: 78637   By: DiRF   Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=32427
Submitted by: Adambomb
Comments: 8  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 05-03-2004
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
64? Corvette


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
5-03-2004 @ 04:14:43 PM
Posted By : musclecarnut711 Reply | Edit | Del
nice

#2
5-03-2004 @ 05:53:11 PM
Posted By : V8Tbird Reply | Edit | Del
#1 very

#3
10-12-2004 @ 04:45:38 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
what you lookin at tatoo guy?

#4
8-03-2005 @ 06:54:54 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
HOLY SHIT! LOOK AT THE SIZE OF THOSE GAHBUNGAS!




Actually, I just wrote that so I could get some more votes. :P


#5
8-03-2005 @ 06:58:55 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#4, *votes 10 for being tricked* :-P

#6
10-22-2008 @ 03:44:15 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
It's a 1967. It doesn't appear to have a big block hood, so it's likely the base 327 small block.

#7
11-04-2008 @ 07:18:29 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#6, Second look shows I was wrong....this is indeed a 1964.

#8
6-17-2010 @ 08:02:21 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
It looks... good in a "not bad" way, because there's nothing "bad" about it. It's just so generic that I'm hard-pressed to actually care enough about it to like it.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, April 26, 2024 11:53:56 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.