|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=37141 |
|
| Comments: 56 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 12-03-2004
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
OMG Its stang's new ride |
Showing page: 2 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
 |
| #22 |
12-29-2004 @ 09:28:46 AM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
this thing my be getting some nads real soon if all goes well. my friend got a late model Explorer 8.8 chunk with stock 3:73s gears and a traction lok. provided its the same as my chunk its going in. if not I'll still get it, but it will be awhile before I'll have the cash to have a shop swap its insides into mine. ethier way it will be a nice step up from what feels like 2:73s in an open rear
|
|
| #23 |
12-29-2004 @ 09:53:17 AM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
explorers came stock with 3.73s? is that for the 4-spd or 5-spd automatic
|
|
| #24 |
12-29-2004 @ 01:23:11 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
beats me, thats just what he told me it came out of.
|
|
| #27 |
1-22-2005 @ 05:32:31 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
eh, doesn't really bother me, he is paying to have it fixed. I just wish he would have busted out my foggy headlight
|
|
| #28 |
1-29-2005 @ 01:19:54 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
this thing really needs more bottom end grunt, can't get up enough speed to really whip it around in the snow
|
|
| #29 |
2-10-2005 @ 09:12:49 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
well I'm getting my new chunk tomorrow, if the weather warms up it may go in next weekend :-)
|
|
| #32 |
2-11-2005 @ 08:10:40 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#31, yep, the tag is still on it, 3L73, my guess is the L stands for traction lok (my stang's 8.8 was taged 2L73, so that makes sense in my mind)
[Edited by stang392 on 2-11-2005 @ 08:12:14 PM]
|
|
| #33 |
2-21-2005 @ 08:40:02 AM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
w00t! Non-Rice King with a score of 1.12 *pets track list*
|
|
| #34 |
2-21-2005 @ 08:59:26 PM |
| Posted By : 89Rettagt |
Reply | Edit | Del |
no offence but how can this be #1? with all these camaros, chevelles, mustangs, cudas etc.... this is by no means rice, but is it #1? It's nice, but not that nice
[Edited by 89Rettagt on 2-21-2005 @ 09:00:30 PM]
|
|
| #35 |
2-21-2005 @ 09:37:16 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#34, cause all it takes is one person voting 1s everyday to get it in the top spot. we have had all kinds of non-muscle cars and non-excotics in the top spot. its just the way the site works
|
|
| #36 |
2-22-2005 @ 04:19:51 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
>_< no 3:73s anytime soon for me, turns out the chunks aren't even close to the same. now I have to find someone that is skilled enough to swap the guts :-(
|
|
| #37 |
3-06-2005 @ 05:27:28 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#34, "Nice" doesn't matter, this car is no more rice than any of the Camaros, Chevelles, Mustangs, or 'Cudas. They're all "1"s just like this car. Since "non-rice" doesn't really vary in degrees, we tend to vote member cars into the non-ricer top 10.
In a way, though, it could be argued that this car is less rice. How? The owner. Remember part of rice is the attitude. Any Chevelle or 'Cuda on the site is owned by someone we don't know. For all we know, they might have a ricer attitude or like rice on certain cars. Whereas we know that this car is owned by a fellow-anti ricer. But that's a bit of gray area, so we'll just say that this car is no less or no more rice.
|
|
| #39 |
3-12-2005 @ 03:40:58 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Nice car but I don't like the wheels. They remind me of those cheap Wal-Mart ones. They're stock right?
|
Showing page: 2 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
