|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
80 |
| Average Score |
2.29 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=37693 |
|
| Comments: 31 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 01-04-2005
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
2006 Dodge Charger |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #2 |
1-04-2005 @ 11:30:36 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I like the c-pillar and rear fender but I don't like the grille
|
|
| #4 |
1-05-2005 @ 12:23:58 AM |
| Posted By : blackcat77 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Whatever it is, it AIN'T a Charger. I'd give it a 4 if it had another name, but it getsan 8 for profaning the name of a car that used to be great.
|
|
| #5 |
1-05-2005 @ 12:59:54 AM |
| Posted By : Tastycakemix |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, Yea! just to keep the tradition of the mighty omni charger, charger should be an option to the Neon!
This is evil!
|
|
| #6 |
1-05-2005 @ 01:00:23 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Oh they screwed the Charger in the ass when it went front wheel drive. This is at least a step in the right direction (rwd v8). Needs two fewer doors and a completely reworked face and itd be perfect.
|
|
| #7 |
1-05-2005 @ 01:02:58 AM |
| Posted By : Tastycakemix |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, They couldn't put charger on anything else at that time. They couldn't predict RWD was going to make a comeback.
Actually, I don't see the point to this. This will just ruin the magnum sales. They should have release the charger as 2 door. If people wanted 4 door, they would get a 300.
[Edited by Tastycakemix on 1-05-2005 @ 01:03:21 AM]
|
|
| #9 |
1-05-2005 @ 01:07:06 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Check out the edit button. Useful!
:P
|
|
| #12 |
1-05-2005 @ 02:12:51 AM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
it is a forward step. 2-3 years ago all was fwd v-6! and i ain't harping on my v-6 fwds'! it goes back to the old school which is where we all need to be. the average fuck tard should not be given the opiton between rwd/fwd and/or 6 cylinder or 8.
|
|
| #13 |
1-05-2005 @ 07:55:06 AM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I dunno... this car kinda leaves me cold... the front doesn't seem to blend well with the rest of the body - the hood almost looks too short. and the rear looks like a Stratus.
[Edited by kstagger on 1-05-2005 @ 07:56:26 AM]
|
|
| #14 |
1-05-2005 @ 08:05:02 AM |
| Posted By : somekid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
question? why are they bothering with bringing back these old great muscle cars and just throwing there name on what ever there minds come up with?
|
|
| #15 |
1-05-2005 @ 08:08:56 AM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#14, marketing for aging yuppies who used to own (or want to own) those cars in the 60s/70s?
basically using their past history to market the stuff for today
|
|
| #17 |
1-05-2005 @ 08:11:32 AM |
| Posted By : Edaw 0 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13, It's like a thought cut short made into metal, seems unfinished.
|
|
| #18 |
1-05-2005 @ 08:13:51 AM |
| Posted By : Edaw 0 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#16, Nice, but there's still something about the front end. Maybe because I think 'truck' when I see the grille.
|
|
| #19 |
1-05-2005 @ 09:55:33 AM |
| Posted By : PA28Aviator |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, from that view, when i look at the front end, i see the new mustang for some reason
|
|
| #20 |
1-05-2005 @ 12:36:44 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Enough about the Omni-based Charger already. Just because the name was bastardized once is no excuse to do it again. They should just sell this thing as the Coronet.
BTW, Car and Driver noted that after revealing the first photos of this car, they got more feedback than they'd gotten on a new car in a very long time....and it was 30 to 1 against it. If Chrysler goes through with this, I have a feeling they will really regret it.
[Edited by Skid on 1-05-2005 @ 12:38:03 PM]
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
