Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 98681   By: DiRF   Comment: "This must have been right around 1979, when the US..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Very nice...."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "So, I pre-odered these last August and they finall..."
Car: 98680   By: Skid   Comment: "Neat! I don't know if I've ever seen one of these ..."
Car: 98616   By: DiRF   Comment: "Sorry for the Shaggy Dog story, but I'm putting of..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 3
Average Score 4.00
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=38370
Submitted by: MxCx
Comments: 9  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 02-11-2005
View Stats Category: Truck
Description:
Good god I want one. I cant believe how incredibly sexy the Infiniti QX56 becomes with a good coat of dirt..


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
2-11-2005 @ 12:16:32 AM
Posted By : Biohazard Reply | Edit | Del
I notice a severe lack of sufficient rock crawling clearance. Just another useless SUV, marketed towards soccer moms, that couldnt clear a parking bump.

[Edited by Biohazard on 2-11-2005 @ 12:16:55 AM]


#2
2-11-2005 @ 12:28:33 AM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
I still like it.

#3
2-11-2005 @ 02:34:02 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
doesnt really matter how much clearance it has, would you take a 50 grand suv off-road? i love these (and the nissan armada) because i have never seen a huge suv move that fast, i used to work for nissan, and i drove them all the time...surprised the hell out of many people

#4
2-11-2005 @ 02:35:29 AM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#3, would you take a 50 grand suv off-road?
Yes. I would.


#5
2-11-2005 @ 02:59:54 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
#3, This is what they were made for? No? Oooops.
BTW here are proofs that 60 grand H2 is worse off road than a stock Suzuki Sidekick:
http://www.fuh2.com/deadh2.php
And a video...:
http://content.collegehumor.com/med...s/hummerbad.wmv
LOL!!!


#6
2-11-2005 @ 03:04:15 AM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#5, That was awesome!

#7
2-11-2005 @ 03:07:17 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
#6, You mean the video?
The terrain... hell, if I took the front bumper off maybe even my car would drive through it. OK, maybe not, but a Sidekick surely would, not even mentioning stock cheapest version of a Jeep.


#8
2-11-2005 @ 09:52:32 AM
Posted By : Gforce18750 Reply | Edit | Del
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/comments.php?auto=33563

#9
8-04-2005 @ 06:34:29 PM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
#3, If it's 50 grand I would expect some sort of off-roading capabilities. Look at the Range Rover, 80 grand and it's one of the world's most capable off-roaders.

34385

[Edited by 427 Vette on 8-04-2005 @ 06:34:38 PM]


Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Saturday, May 4, 2024 12:13:39 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.