|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
Total Votes |
19 |
Average Score |
2.26 |
Verdict |
Good
|
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=4186 |
|
Comments: 27 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 04-15-2002
|
View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Misc |
|
Description:
Twin Turbo 8-Series. Quicker than that Viper. |
Showing page: 1 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
|
#2 |
5-28-2002 @ 02:53:09 AM |
Posted By : cuda_man |
Reply | Edit | Del |
notice the Viper is an early model, looks to be a 92 model which was the car's first year.... if the BMW wasn't quicker it deserves a kick in the can! |
|
#4 |
6-22-2002 @ 10:49:03 PM |
Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Soooooo many intake runners.... pretty.... |
|
#5 |
6-22-2002 @ 10:50:22 PM |
Posted By : Jon |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Sooooo much horsepower, although i'd rather have the Viper |
|
#6 |
6-22-2002 @ 10:51:35 PM |
Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'd rather have the 8-series... that is the ONLY BMW I'll EVER say that about. 8-serieses just rule. |
|
#7 |
6-22-2002 @ 10:52:41 PM |
Posted By : Jon |
Reply | Edit | Del |
they are incredible, one of the best cars ever made, but im a giant Viper fan, those classic first era Vipers are my fav |
|
#8 |
6-29-2002 @ 01:34:39 AM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Those lights are weird where they are. The bonnet has two big holes in it, or would if we could see them. |
|
#9 |
10-07-2002 @ 03:38:52 AM |
Posted By : viper31 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
True its quicker than that 92 viper, but compared to a non stock viper, like the twin turbo viper that hennessey motorsports made, then the 8 series can eat its own ass, but i have much love for the bimmer. Its an awesome piece of german machinary |
|
#10 |
10-07-2002 @ 05:10:28 AM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I reckon both engines with twin turbos, it would a close race. |
|
#11 |
10-07-2002 @ 06:41:45 AM |
Posted By : Jon |
Reply | Edit | Del |
If you put a TT viper against a TT 8, the Viper would win. As far what year that viper is, it could be anywhere from 1992 to 1996. |
|
#12 |
10-10-2002 @ 01:20:12 PM |
Posted By : viper31 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, NO!!!! YOU JACK ASS!! LEARN ABOUT VIPERS BEFORE YOU TALK!!!. I agree with you saying yes it would win, but that RT/10 can only be a 92- 94, notice the 3 spoked wheels. all im saying is learn about it. in 96 they had a new wheel design, and in 94 they did some new paint schemes, but they still had the red. thats all for now |
|
#13 |
10-13-2002 @ 08:51:13 PM |
Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12 You're the jack-ass for gettin' all bitchy about what fuckin' year a car you'll never own is. And BTW, the BMW would stomp it around the turns. |
|
#14 |
10-13-2002 @ 08:53:49 PM |
Posted By : 454Nova |
Reply | Edit | Del |
let me find the pic where he was tellin me about his plans to install 2 x 12" subs in that center console on an RT/10 |
|
#15 |
10-13-2002 @ 08:54:04 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
plus just cause someone goofs on the years the vipers had that wheels is no reason to call them a jackass, which if you were a real viper owner you would know that
[Edited by stang392 on 10-13-2002 @ 08:55:25 PM] |
|
#16 |
10-13-2002 @ 08:55:12 PM |
Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Actually Jon was right. They had the 3 spokes up until '96. Viper even said so, read his post carefully. |
|
#17 |
10-13-2002 @ 08:57:25 PM |
Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Notice the little bitch doesn't post what he drives in his profile. Probably a blue '88 Horizon with white stripes, R/T badges and a blown head gasket. |
|
#19 |
10-13-2002 @ 08:58:54 PM |
Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
A cross between Mac, BlakRat, and Ultraz28. Some odd ricer gangbang offspring or something. |
Showing page: 1 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|