|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=49345 |
|
| Comments: 23 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-01-2006
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Black Mustang. |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #1 |
2-01-2006 @ 10:53:14 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
*looks at badges* Engine swap? Identity crisis?
I think the Saleen front fascia looks too busy for the rest of the car, where most of the stuff has been smoothed out.
[Edited by Lemming on 2-01-2006 @ 10:53:30 PM]
|
|
| #3 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:07:22 PM |
| Posted By : Hoopd87 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
man, I need some 5.8 badges for my Cutlass!
|
|
| #4 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:12:01 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Ill pass on my 2.2 badges >_>
|
|
| #5 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:13:24 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, I am aware of this. That still would've necessitated removal of the engine. :p
edit: I think 4.2 badges would really confuse the hell out of people. :D
[Edited by Lemming on 2-01-2006 @ 11:13:52 PM]
|
|
| #6 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:22:12 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, "Thats a small V8..whered ya get it? ...sounds weird too."
|
|
| #7 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:25:17 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, but if you uses the stock block it wouldn't be a swap, it would be a rebuild :-P
|
|
| #8 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:27:15 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, True.
There's also that oddly expensive Cammer engine, but I doubt that's the case here. :p
edit: Also, I used a stock block, but that was definitely a swap. :p What a mess.
[Edited by Lemming on 2-01-2006 @ 11:27:50 PM]
|
|
| #10 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:32:25 PM |
| Posted By : Hoopd87 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, 5.8 badges on my Cutlass would confuse the shit outta people
|
|
| #11 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:35:51 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, I'm competing with WSDOT*, actually, to see how long a project can take. :p
*There is a lot of road widening that needs to be done that WSDOT is "working on," which basically means that it will never be done.
|
|
| #13 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:43:01 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, No, they just allow the roads to deteriorate to a near-cobblestone level* while conveniently delaying road widening projects.
*fun fact: 5-link rear suspension with 350 lb-in rear springs actually causes less bruising on choppy macadam than factory rear suspension with 200-250 lb-in springs.
|
|
| #15 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:48:32 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, i think that might be the best way to sum up the Penn DOT I have ever heard :-)
|
|
| #16 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:50:41 PM |
| Posted By : zoomzoom |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15, ditto on NJ......road projests can last for years and years.
|
|
| #17 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:51:42 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I miss Florida sometimes. At least the stuff they're not working on still has some asphalt left on it.
|
|
| #18 |
2-01-2006 @ 11:54:38 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#16, years and years is nothing, PennDOT have been repaving the same section of I81 since I was a little kid
|
|
| #19 |
2-02-2006 @ 12:06:55 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
God, don't get me started on MDOT, where basically a bunch of fat guys in orange vests stand around a circle of traffic cones and pick their asses is still considered "working".
Nice Mustang BTW, the Saleen front bumper and the subtle skirting really work well with the car's lines. I'm confused about the badging though, they stopped putting 5.0L engines in Mustangs in 1995 didn't they?
[Edited by Subourbon187 on 2-02-2006 @ 12:07:49 AM]
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
