|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
Total Votes |
315 |
Average Score |
5.14 |
Verdict |
Not Rice
|
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=5149 |
|
Comments: 17 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 05-01-2002
|
View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
Description:
RSX
more pics at
http://freeyourmeat.com/rsx/ |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
|
#1 |
5-01-2002 @ 02:12:29 PM |
Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Nice and classy. Looks quite good. Please do us a favor and don't join the ranks of the Rice Lemmings. |
|
#6 |
5-10-2002 @ 05:28:23 PM |
Posted By : brentpaugh |
Reply | Edit | Del |
blackout rims ... stylish! the 4 door civic is a sleeper! |
|
#7 |
5-10-2002 @ 05:33:53 PM |
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Looks like an 80' T-bird back there, ugly model right before they became decent cars again |
|
#8 |
7-24-2002 @ 04:01:32 PM |
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I had one of these tailgating me this morning...I got a CLOSE look at it. I thought it was pretty ugly on both ends. |
|
#9 |
7-24-2002 @ 04:03:37 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't like the RSX. It's gotten to the point where Acura's entry level model looks JUST LIKE a Honda Civic. I mean, I know it's based on a similar/same platform, but they could at least TRY. |
|
#12 |
1-11-2003 @ 08:32:20 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, i dont think that model year is all that ugly, plus they had 460s in them |
|
#13 |
1-11-2003 @ 08:44:35 PM |
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, That one looks too new to have a 460, by 1980, the big block was gone from the sedans IIRC |
|
#14 |
1-11-2003 @ 08:50:02 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13, i have seen more then a few ads for these with 460s in them, that said it was factory |
|
#16 |
1-11-2003 @ 08:55:30 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15, they may have been in low numbers, or the ads could have been fucked up. i'll see if i can find any info |
|
#17 |
1-11-2003 @ 08:59:48 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
methinks the ads were wrong, site i'm looking on lists the 302 as the biggest engine this year |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|