|
|
|
|
|
This image has been retired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
579 |
| Average Score |
3.95 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=622 |
|
| Comments: 35 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 01-17-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Truck |
|
|
Description:
this is my 2000 Xterra, I use it on raining days or whe we go out skiing.. this way my 98
Camaro SS (photo #261) and my 96 Impala SS (photo # 581) stay nice and clean |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #2 |
1-17-2002 @ 04:38:36 PM |
| Posted By : Anti-Ricer 007 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
This truck may be technically rice, but its a beautiful truck, nice choice no1camaro on the post.
|
|
| #7 |
1-17-2002 @ 05:41:55 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The Xterras are pretty good, as far as SUVs go. They're no-frills, and can actually go off road. If I was going off-roading in a new vehicle, it would be my 2nd choice (right behind Jeep).
|
|
| #8 |
1-17-2002 @ 09:00:12 PM |
| Posted By : daseansta |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Wow, so you own something that IS'NT a chevy, but I'm sure you still think it's rice. no1cam, cause it ain't a chevy, heheheh.
|
|
| #9 |
1-17-2002 @ 09:10:03 PM |
| Posted By : HatinOnHondas |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Although I love my domestic.. I havta bitch about Chevy.. or.. well GM.. my mom got a new 2002 Envoy.. shes had it about..ehh.. a week.. and I jus got back from picking her up from a gas station because it overheated.. already!! Thank god it came w/ OnStar..
|
|
| #10 |
1-21-2002 @ 02:40:14 AM |
| Posted By : BiggLekk3Si |
Reply | Edit | Del |
SUV's.... Big car Small Brain.... I dislike SUV's in general, nothing especially wrong with this one, they all just look like yuppie mobiles to me...
|
|
| #11 |
2-11-2002 @ 01:33:35 AM |
| Posted By : 500plus |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'm not a fan of SUV's but this one looks nice.
|
|
| #14 |
7-03-2002 @ 08:06:46 PM |
| Posted By : noname |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i have a friend(blonde) that called these a ford nissan one time (by accident) we still pick on her about it from time to time
|
|
| #15 |
7-03-2002 @ 08:08:23 PM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Nothing beats my sister. She once ordered $5 worth of chips, and then asked how much it was going to cost. The thing that tops it off is 3 days later she dyed her hair blonde.
|
|
| #18 |
7-03-2002 @ 08:15:31 PM |
| Posted By : Moose |
Reply | Edit | Del |
well british chips are fries I believe, and the way you said chips it sounded like fries, rather than crispy, thin, salty potato chips. So aussie chips are fries?
|
|
| #19 |
7-03-2002 @ 08:19:07 PM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Ok. Chips are fatter. At least 1cmx1cmxthe lenght of the potato. Fries are thinner. Then what you are thinking of is crisps. They are still ALL called chips but thats their propper name. But dont you have fish'n'chip shops where you order say $3 worth of chips/fries.
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
