|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
622 |
| Average Score |
2.98 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=7650 |
|
| Comments: 44 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 07-08-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
Photoshops of this image:
8361, 8731, 10961, |
Description:
So, here it is. My '84 Camaro Berlinetta. |
Showing page: 1 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
 |
| #1 |
7-08-2002 @ 01:51:35 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The car features: '91-'92 Camaro Z/28 ground effects and wheels (installed by previous owner), Sport Coupe front clip (goof-up by my body shop, but I think it looks better), and a stock 305 V8 with a 700R4 tranny. Future plans include: Build up of the 305 (I plan to make no less than 300 hp with it), electrical repairs, new shocks with polyurethane bushings, shift kit, and a Ford 9 inch rear with posi trac and probably 3.55 gears.
|
|
| #3 |
7-08-2002 @ 01:56:55 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Somewhere in the region of 150, I think. It's sort of weak, but torque is fairly good, so it's quick off the line (quicker than my damn Volvo, anyway).
BTW, anybody know of an effective way to bolt dual exhaust onto a 3rd gen? Everyone tells me that dual exhaust is impossible on this car without a lot of rigging, but didn't later 3rd gens have them?
|
|
| #4 |
7-08-2002 @ 04:08:27 PM |
| Posted By : NerfHerder |
Reply | Edit | Del |
uh oh, it wont be long untill there is a photoshop of this car up, I just have a feeling.
|
|
| #6 |
7-08-2002 @ 06:44:39 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Go ahead. I might beat you to it....
|
|
| #7 |
7-09-2002 @ 12:30:33 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
150hp? then the 305 in my el camino wasnt THAT bad with 170hp...i just want to slap every single gm engineer from the 80's that contributed to making all their V8's suck ass, well maybe except the vette ones
|
|
| #9 |
7-09-2002 @ 12:58:56 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
They started sucking long before that, consdier the 403 Olds in my 1977 car, it puts out a blistering 180-190 HP, thats' baaaaaddd, by the 80's they had simply perfected the suckiness so that it applied accross the board, and lets not even go NEAR the fiasco that was the 301 Pontiac Turbo
|
|
| #10 |
7-09-2002 @ 02:44:30 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Boy, that was an awful engine. I've actually heard that the Pontiac 301 turbo wouldn't accelerate going up a hill.
|
|
| #12 |
9-10-2002 @ 07:56:35 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#3 Non-Ricer with a score of 2.57, can it make it to be the Non-Ricer King???? Tune in next time to find out
|
|
| #13 |
9-10-2002 @ 07:57:46 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Have we ever even had a 3rd Gen Non-Rice king? I know we've had 1sts, 2nds and 4ths make it.....
|
|
| #14 |
9-10-2002 @ 07:58:41 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I voted 1, mostly because the car isn't rice, but also because Skid's Photoshops are ridiculous.
|
|
| #16 |
9-10-2002 @ 08:00:02 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah, but I don't think you've posted a picture, Obsidian.
|
|
| #17 |
9-13-2002 @ 12:26:50 AM |
| Posted By : Eviloki3z |
Reply | Edit | Del |
hey skid,ive got your car in P-shop format,any colour you like to see it ?
|
|
| #18 |
9-13-2002 @ 12:28:19 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Imagine my car in the top 10 non-ricers. I didn't figure that would happen, what with all the 3rd gen bashing that goes around here.
#17, it has blue interior, so show me something in the range of dark blue.
|
|
| #20 |
9-13-2002 @ 12:48:08 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Those are good. The yellow actually looks pretty nice. You oughta submit them, let everyone see them.
|
Showing page: 1 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
