|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=8179 |
|
| Comments: 48 (Read/Post) Favorites: 3 (View) |
Submitted
on: 07-21-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Okay, lets say this Camaro rolls up to you at a light in the summer of 1969. You think
you can take it, you thought wrong. This is one of only 69 sutch Camaros built with
COPO order #9560, that little detail equipped this car with the all-aluminum ZL-1 427
BB, the steet verison of Chevy's NASCAR race engine, say hello to 430 HP, and if tuned
for dragging, 500+. Fewer than 30 remain today |
Showing page: 1 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
 |
| #1 |
7-21-2002 @ 12:04:17 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Base price for this car in 69' was $7,000, today, you can't get one for less than $125,000
|
|
| #2 |
7-21-2002 @ 04:39:33 PM |
| Posted By : 454Nova |
Reply | Edit | Del |
shit... my civic with Noss could take it!
Im sure that 125,000 is on the really low side!
|
|
| #3 |
7-21-2002 @ 04:40:01 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
THere was a COPO Corvette that used the same engine, a few of those became legendary on the drag strip in the modified producton classes, with low 11's as stock times, and trap speeds of 130+, they could almost afford to stop at the end and wait for the competition.
|
|
| #4 |
7-21-2002 @ 08:25:42 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah, 125K is the minimum you can expect to pay, sky's the limit for these I'm sure
|
|
| #6 |
7-22-2002 @ 01:08:59 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I see you used the underrated 430 hp rating....nothing like adding to its sleeper image.
Well, if you can consider any Camaro with 430 hp a "sleeper".
|
|
| #9 |
12-04-2002 @ 03:47:22 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Your best bet is to insure it as an antique car. You can do that (in PA at least) if the car is older than 25 years old.
|
|
| #10 |
2-14-2003 @ 12:44:56 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, Yeah, you can get it registered as an Antique/Classic car, but that caps your driving, I think it sets a limit of miles you can put on it, or restrics you to driving it only to and from events, or not after dark, or somthing like that....
Incidentaly, the COPO ZL-1 Camaro has the distinciton of being the fastest "production" Camaro ever built, recording a 1/4 mile pass at 10.4/128mph
|
|
| #11 |
2-14-2003 @ 12:50:39 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Well my Mustang will only be a Sunday car and maybe an occasional show, so that'll be fine for me.
|
|
| #13 |
2-22-2003 @ 12:48:04 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, No, no no! The Handcode was a stretched 4 door Corvette with a Cadillac 500 punched out to a 510, supercharged, and AWD. They were pretty fast when you shifted them into "H".
|
|
| #15 |
2-22-2003 @ 12:53:44 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#14, Oh yeah, the 545. I forgot about that one.
|
|
| #17 |
2-22-2003 @ 12:59:33 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#16, Handcode II? Surely you're thinking of the Ford Cibra!
|
|
| #18 |
2-22-2003 @ 01:03:26 PM |
| Posted By : Bling24 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The first HII not counting the hummer had a version of the gnx's 3.8 exept they gave it two more cylinders which bumped the output to 4.4 liters and the engine was bored to 325 cubes
|
|
| #19 |
2-22-2003 @ 01:10:27 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#18, Oh yeah, made in the '80s. It was inferior to the original '69 Handcode, though. :D
|
|
| #20 |
2-22-2003 @ 01:13:01 PM |
| Posted By : Bling24 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
it wasn't inferior it bould out perform an 80's F1 car it was quite superior
|
Showing page: 1 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
