Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 20705   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "DJ KHALED!..."
Car: 97661   By: Skid   Comment: "They're not the worst, but there are quite a few w..."
Car: 97661   By: DiRF   Comment: "They're like polished, oversized versions of what ..."
Car: 97661   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "those wheels are awful, especially on here...."
Car: 33317   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Before the Ineos Grenadier, there was this. I reme..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 305
Average Score 2.84
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=8199
Submitted by: hotcamaro
Comments: 39  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 3  (View)
Submitted on: 07-21-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
chevelle


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#1
7-21-2002 @ 09:39:00 PM
Posted By : Jon Reply | Edit | Del
where!?

#2
7-25-2002 @ 01:46:27 PM
Posted By : VonChad Reply | Edit | Del
Beautiful... '68 or '69?

#3
7-25-2002 @ 01:51:24 PM
Posted By : Wingnut Reply | Edit | Del
I don't know my Chevelle's too well, but I'd guess 70 or 71.

#4
7-25-2002 @ 01:53:39 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
I'm willing to bet it's a '69. '70 and '71 had a different nose, and I believe '68 was still runnin' the bad-ass Vette-style round tail-lights.

#5
7-25-2002 @ 01:54:00 PM
Posted By : VonChad Reply | Edit | Del
It's definitely '68 or '69. '70-'72 had two "corners" to the rear window rather than the one there. The sad thing is... I deduced this from flipping through Old Car Trader just this morning.

#6
7-25-2002 @ 01:57:09 PM
Posted By : Wingnut Reply | Edit | Del
OK, so 68 had the cool tail lights (didn't those go back to 66 or so?) and VonChad, are you talking about the rear side window? Changed shape from 69 to 70, huh? It's good to talk to those that know.

#7
7-25-2002 @ 02:00:06 PM
Posted By : VonChad Reply | Edit | Del
Yep, rear side window.
I'll see if I can find a decent pic of a '70-'72. They're the Chevelles I generally picture when I hear the name.


#8
7-25-2002 @ 02:01:00 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
Yeah, now that you mention it, the later quarter windows were a bit larger. If the ones here roll down like mine, I can see how they'd be a major pain in the ass to fix or replace. I don't remember if my friends 'Velle was a '69 with a '68 nose or vise versa, but I'm pretty sure it had these tail-lights and I really wanna say it was a '69.

#9
7-25-2002 @ 02:04:01 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
If i had one I'd have to get new quarters just to put the round tail-light bumper in. They were sweet. Besides, most of the old Chevelles you find now need new quarters anyway, so it wouldn't be like hackin' up a classic for nothin'. '70 with the pretty front end and the round tail-lights out back. Perfect combo.

#10
7-25-2002 @ 02:04:10 PM
Posted By : VonChad Reply | Edit | Del
http://flag.blackened.net/daver/pics/malibu/chevy3.gif
Copy and paste... it doesn't look great, but you can see how the rear passenger window comes to 2 points rather than 1 there.


#11
7-25-2002 @ 02:07:36 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
Aha! I was wrong. That '70 in the pic had the round tail-lights in the bumper (I just know by the shape of the bumper) which explains why I liked the look so much. Which means this car is a '68 and the round tail-lights STARTED in '69. Mystery solved.

#12
7-25-2002 @ 02:08:30 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
That explains why I dig the '69 so much too.

#13
7-25-2002 @ 02:09:08 PM
Posted By : VonChad Reply | Edit | Del
Ahh... I was thinking that the '70-'72 HAD the round ones in the bumper, like I said, they're the ones I think of first when I hear Chevelle.

#14
7-25-2002 @ 02:12:07 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
They did. And yeah, that is the first thing to come to mind when I hear the name. I think the confusion of my friends body/nose combo threw me off.

#15
7-25-2002 @ 02:14:24 PM
Posted By : VonChad Reply | Edit | Del
Are you sure the round ones were in the '69?

#16
7-25-2002 @ 02:14:59 PM
Posted By : Wingnut Reply | Edit | Del
This concludes my Lesson on Chevelles for today...

#17
7-25-2002 @ 02:16:30 PM
Posted By : VonChad Reply | Edit | Del
Hehe... glad we could help. I'm still foggy on the round tails, I'm thinking they started in '70 but I'm hardly an expert and TinIndian probably knows better than I do!

#18
7-25-2002 @ 02:17:43 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
#15 Had to be. I knew they were in either the '69 or '69, and now we've figured out it was '69 cuz the '70 had them too. I'll bet money on it.

#19
7-25-2002 @ 02:18:52 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
I'm no expert either, bro, but I do dig Velles. Pontiac's my drug of choice, though.

#20
7-25-2002 @ 02:20:30 PM
Posted By : Wingnut Reply | Edit | Del
Fomr the name, tinIndian, I suppose you're a fan of the Chieftans?

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Saturday, November 23, 2024 04:22:40 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.