|
|
|
|
|
This image has been retired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
872 |
| Average Score |
5.68 |
| Verdict |
Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=843 |
|
| Comments: 19 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-05-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
1997 Acura GSR
13.55 @ 100mph
GREDDY turbo kit @ 8 psi *NEW!!*
-Custom front mount intercooler
-Holley 255 lph fuel pump
-ACT xtreme performance clutch -stage 6
-Toda lightened chromoly flywheel (8 lbs)
-DC sports catback exhaust
-Koni adjustable shocks
-Neuspeed race springs
-Neuspeed 19mm rear sway bar
-Energy suspension urethane bushing kit
-Neuspeed rear lower tiebar |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #3 |
2-06-2002 @ 02:23:50 PM |
| Posted By : GhettoGlider |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i hope that blimp to the left aint the owner. all those mods just to keep times @ stock performance!
|
|
| #4 |
2-06-2002 @ 02:38:08 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Man, you're rude. Sure he can't beat you in a race, but would you say that to his face? Probably not.
|
|
| #5 |
2-06-2002 @ 04:12:07 PM |
| Posted By : Monjoho |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Not bad at all. I think ho should have left the acura emblem on the front but at least its not debadged with a crow bar like so many other ricers.
|
|
| #7 |
2-11-2002 @ 05:22:14 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
But 8psi with an intercooler that big? Should be running more than that or at least have a smaller intercooler.
|
|
| #8 |
2-11-2002 @ 03:53:23 PM |
| Posted By : MulletPatrol |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Integra's can't take that much boost or their weenie aluminum blocks go CAPOW and there goes the VTEC cylinder head to the moon.
I'm assuming the Greddy turbo kit is running some sort of T3 varient (They all are), which is way too large for the 1.8L engine, which makes neither the turbo nor the engine really happy. But oh no, they have to have BIG BIG TURBOS so their penis size will increase. I ask to the honda turbo'ers, why not go for a T-25? Or a T28 if they wanted bigger? They could run those @ ~16 psi and have a car that pulls equivelant time with better spool-up, better turbo performance and a happier engine. Granted with a turbo that size you'd probably hit the wall @ low twelves on those cars with a turbo that size, but they all think they're going to be running 11 flats's so they toss on the biggest turbo they can.
What a waste. :/
|
|
| #10 |
3-11-2002 @ 04:35:08 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
still, 8psi I would think would get it out of the mid 13s... I guess it's probably a t35 or something, and spooling is a huge problem.
|
|
| #11 |
3-30-2002 @ 04:20:52 PM |
| Posted By : Jon |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Ill never like the front ends of these, but it is pretty clean.
|
|
| #12 |
4-29-2002 @ 03:22:38 PM |
| Posted By : Instance |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Am I the only one here who thinks this sucks? Hello, look how much he's modified. If I spent that much, got myself some forced induction, and generally played with things, I'd be under 12 by a fair piece, maybe in the 10s (though traction would become a huge problem). What's with that? 'Let's get a slow POS and spend huge gobs of money to make it barely stand up to real cars off the assembly line'? At least it looks clean, I very much agree.
|
|
| #13 |
7-20-2002 @ 01:40:09 AM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I was wondering that too, it's a nice car, and not riced at all, but 13.55 seems a bit slow don't you think?
|
|
| #14 |
7-20-2002 @ 01:41:57 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Traction is huge problem for FWD cars, anyway integras aret drag cars they are track cars.
|
|
| #15 |
7-20-2002 @ 01:46:07 AM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Mullet: A T3/T4 hybrid works much better than one would think on the Honda B18. While normal thinking would put the T3/T4 as too big for a 1.8 liter motor, the extremely high rev capacity of these engines makes it actually surprisingly practical. And yes, the high ish time is almost certainly due to launching and traction issues.
|
|
| #16 |
10-20-2002 @ 05:44:33 PM |
| Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
exactly 100 mph?
right-on-the-nose-dead-on-square-flawless-perfect-exactly 100 mph?
or is that why they call them acura's?
|
|
| #18 |
11-23-2002 @ 10:30:04 AM |
| Posted By : NOSsucks |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Might be a 4-door? Could help explain the time.
I hope he doesn't drive with a stage 6 Clutch on the street, probably a bitch to keep from burning out when he shifts.
Anyway, I like it :)
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
