|
|
|
|
|
This image has been retired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
788 |
| Average Score |
5.40 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=875 |
|
| Comments: 43 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-08-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Now this is a ute and a half. Twin turbo V8, 1079 rwhp. Its got some kick. |
Showing page: 2 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
 |
| #21 |
8-16-2002 @ 02:10:11 AM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
the first argument I remember being in was #420, a IROC-Z, which isn't there anymore. Max called me a dumb ricer, I believe the argument started when I said that the stock output of those was terrible.
|
|
| #22 |
8-16-2002 @ 02:11:32 AM |
| Posted By : Lebo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
lol...I remember finding the ricecop link on beaterz...the mainpage was rather boring without riceornot :P
|
|
| #23 |
8-16-2002 @ 02:19:51 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I found the link on vlcaliasturbo.com. That was a while back now.
|
|
| #26 |
9-28-2002 @ 07:14:26 PM |
| Posted By : 426plymouth |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Use a truck for what it was meant for, not a show vehicle...
|
|
| #29 |
9-28-2002 @ 07:18:03 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It sits too low and it's probably got a more car-like suspension. It's a ute. And they seem to love making hotrods out of 'em over there.
|
|
| #30 |
9-28-2002 @ 07:20:49 PM |
| Posted By : 426plymouth |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Well, if it has a bed on it the need to make use of it or either just make it into a station wagon...
i cant stand those Chevy things that they call a suv that turns into a pickup, Its always a pickup!
Just one moment its a pickup with a bed cover on it and the next its a pickup with no bed cover and the backend opened up...
|
|
| #31 |
9-28-2002 @ 07:22:18 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The Avalanche (which is, I believe, what you are referring to) is a pretty silly idea. I kind of like these things, though. Sort of like an El Camino (although Holden utes actually predate that particular vehicle).
|
|
| #32 |
9-28-2002 @ 07:24:12 PM |
| Posted By : 426plymouth |
Reply | Edit | Del |
And i still consider it a truck, car chassis or no car chassis...
|
|
| #34 |
9-28-2002 @ 07:35:06 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Well, the worst thing about the current GM vehicles (in my opinion, anyway) is that. Cars have had lots of plastic for a long time. However, usually manufacturers have had the good taste to paint it. But now they're leaving it grey, and their trucks are starting to look like cheap children's toys. If they'd at least paint it some gloss color that goes with the truck body, it would look sooo much better.
ed: cleaned up my text a little, meaning unchanged.
[Edited by Lemming on 9-28-2002 @ 07:35:52 PM]
|
|
| #35 |
9-28-2002 @ 07:37:59 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#34, I've seen some with cladding panted to match, they look better but still ugly
apparently I have the typing ability of a monkey
[Edited by solid_snake on 9-28-2002 @ 07:42:13 PM]
|
|
| #36 |
9-28-2002 @ 07:39:41 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#35, Yeah, but it would get rid of their biggest problem. Now if we could get them to hire some sane car designers, I'd consider buying GM products.
[Edited by Lemming on 9-28-2002 @ 07:40:02 PM]
|
Showing page: 2 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
