Ricecop's Rice Or Not?

Latest Comments

Car: 98863	By: Skid	Comment: "The quality of the custom work is actually quite g..."
Car: 20705	By: ricerocketboy	Comment: "DJ KHALED!..."
Car: 97661	By: Skid	Comment: "They're not the worst, but there are quite a few w..."
Car: 97661	By: DiRF	Comment: "They're like polished, oversized versions of what ..."
Car: 97661	By: ricerocketboy	Comment: "those wheels are awful, especially on here...."

See last 25 comments

Go to
Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post

Top 10
Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad

New & Retired
Newest Images Retired Images

Other
Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats

Online Now
0 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List

View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.

Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=11181	Submitted by: stang392
Comments: 67 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View)	Submitted on: 09-16-2002
View Stats	Category: Car

Description: Well here it is, my 90 5.0 as it looked when i first got it

Showing page: 1 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]


#1	9-16-2002 @ 09:16:10 PM
Posted By : Jon	Reply \| Edit \| Del
awww ewww


#2	9-16-2002 @ 09:17:07 PM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Damn. Need a better pic for SHOPPIN'! Nice car, BTW.


#3	9-16-2002 @ 09:17:31 PM
Posted By : stang392	Reply \| Edit \| Del
and Lemming you might want to wait before photoshop this cause i have a newer pic of it looks now, it just might be another day or two before i get it up


#4	9-16-2002 @ 09:20:26 PM
Posted By : 454Nova	Reply \| Edit \| Del
did i hear..... photoshop?


#5	9-16-2002 @ 09:20:37 PM
Posted By : Lemming	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Yeah, this is a little on the small side, too.


#6	9-16-2002 @ 09:22:31 PM
Posted By : stang392	Reply \| Edit \| Del
yeah i think this is the best the person could do with their scaner


#7	9-16-2002 @ 09:25:08 PM
Posted By : stang392	Reply \| Edit \| Del
ah yes and before Skid tries to call this a 4.9 as he does on all other stangs, its not this is a true 5.0 thanks to the 306 under the hood [Edited by stang392 on 9-16-2002 @ 09:25:44 PM]


#8	9-16-2002 @ 09:26:31 PM
Posted By : 454Nova	Reply \| Edit \| Del
and as im sure you all know, the TRUE 5.0L engine was the Chevy 307ci


#9	9-16-2002 @ 10:50:49 PM
Posted By : stang392	Reply \| Edit \| Del
damn i'm already up to a 4! WTF??


#10	10-11-2002 @ 11:28:03 PM
Posted By : stang392	Reply \| Edit \| Del
fuck everyone that gave me a ten and a 5 for that matter


#11	10-29-2002 @ 04:56:59 PM
Posted By : stang392	Reply \| Edit \| Del
THE STANG LIVES AGAIN!!!!!!


#12	10-29-2002 @ 05:01:32 PM
Posted By : 426plymouth	Reply \| Edit \| Del
looks just like my freinds 2.3


#13	10-29-2002 @ 05:03:54 PM
Posted By : stang392	Reply \| Edit \| Del
BTW putting a tranny in a car is no fun at all


#14	10-29-2002 @ 05:05:34 PM
Posted By : 426plymouth	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Doing almost any work in a Ford isnt fun, thus why i dont like them...


#15	10-29-2002 @ 05:07:55 PM
Posted By : stang392	Reply \| Edit \| Del
not really, i have done a lot that wasn't that bad at all, but the ones that are a pain in the ass more then make for the easy ones


#16	10-29-2002 @ 05:09:38 PM
Posted By : 426plymouth	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I Know that working on a 86 Tempo is a nightmare O_O


#17	11-02-2002 @ 07:53:56 PM
Posted By : solid_snake	Reply \| Edit \| Del
you have my 1


#18	11-02-2002 @ 07:55:09 PM
Posted By : stang392	Reply \| Edit \| Del
thank you sir


#19	11-03-2002 @ 08:57:07 AM
Posted By : stang392	Reply \| Edit \| Del
just 21 more votes


#20	11-03-2002 @ 08:59:29 AM
Posted By : Lemming	Reply \| Edit \| Del
20..

Showing page: 1 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]

Login to leave a comment

	Classifieds
Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Saturday, November 23, 2024 06:03:22 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.