|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=11791 |
|
| Comments: 66 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 09-28-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Photoshop/Art |
|
|
Description:
screen shot from vice city |
Showing page: 2 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
 |
| #22 |
9-28-2002 @ 01:52:05 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#20, Having a system with about 4MB of RAM means low-detail textures. There's pretty much no way around it.
|
|
| #23 |
9-28-2002 @ 01:52:10 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I've had every system, except the SNES and PS1, man I should sell them in 10 years
|
|
| #24 |
9-28-2002 @ 01:53:53 PM |
| Posted By : 427 Vette |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#22 i heard PS3 will have 256mb of ram and a 64mb emotion 2 video chip
|
|
| #25 |
9-28-2002 @ 01:54:03 PM |
| Posted By : XtremeRacer-TypeR |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I've had Sega Genisis, SNES, Game Boy (original and color), PS1, PS2..i think thats it
|
|
| #26 |
9-28-2002 @ 01:55:31 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#24, Yeah, and by the time that's out, PCs with 1GB of RAM and 256MB of video RAM will be available (maybe even common). Heck, I'm already halfway there on both counts.
|
|
| #27 |
9-28-2002 @ 01:56:07 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#24, Too bad when Y-box and Game Pentagon come out, they'll be saying we have better graphics, well guess what?? Graphics mean nothing if your games sucks!
and I wonder why Halo 2 is coming out december 2003, why give us the trailers when its not even coming out this year?
|
|
| #28 |
9-28-2002 @ 01:57:36 PM |
| Posted By : 427 Vette |
Reply | Edit | Del |
yea but a MGS 2 for pc requires a fast pc to match the PS2 graphics
|
|
| #31 |
9-28-2002 @ 02:01:41 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#30, Doh. Should've known. I've got the original on PC, and it's not the best port, so you might be right on that one.
|
|
| #32 |
9-28-2002 @ 02:04:07 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
You're forgetting, though, that the X-Box is a fixed platform. That means drivers, etc. can be very highly optimized, so the hardware performs much better than an equivalent PC.
Admittedly games choice is a bit scarce ATM but I'm sure that'll change soon.
This "my console has a bigger dick than your console" shit is all stupid anyway.
|
|
| #33 |
9-28-2002 @ 02:05:49 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Some guy took apart a X-Box and tried to use it on his PC, it didnt't work though
|
|
| #34 |
9-28-2002 @ 02:08:06 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#33, That's because they made some *cough*customizations*cough* when they designed the X-Box. To prevent people from swapping hardware in and out of regular PCs.
|
|
| #35 |
9-28-2002 @ 02:09:46 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
thats sucks, I'd love to be able to upgrade my console, without having to buy a whole new one...
hay wait, thats a great Idea, I rock!
|
|
| #36 |
9-28-2002 @ 02:26:27 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#20, N64 had more video memory than playstation...plus it was 8mb with the expansion pack
|
|
| #38 |
9-28-2002 @ 02:27:51 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I know, but most games didn't use the expansion pack. The graphics detail on the original PS wasn't very good, either. The N64 was doubly limited-even though it did have the most RAM for the time, it also was limited by the relative expense of cartridges.
|
|
| #39 |
9-28-2002 @ 02:28:06 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#37, 2MB. Good memory.
Edit: I meant yours, not the console's :-)
[Edited by Lemming on 9-28-2002 @ 02:28:49 PM]
|
|
| #40 |
9-28-2002 @ 02:29:17 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
what gave me a headache? the incredibly low-res squares on the ps1 that chugged at around a steady 10 frames per second
|
Showing page: 2 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
