|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
78 |
| Average Score |
5.38 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=12304 |
|
| Comments: 127 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 10-07-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
No description |
Showing page: 2 of 7
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ]
 |
| #21 |
10-07-2002 @ 09:43:52 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#20 Sold out and went "retro". They only really look good with ground fx.
|
|
| #22 |
10-07-2002 @ 09:46:19 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
What's with that retro garbage, anyway? They have to throw in a few modern stlying cues to keep it "fresh" and they wind up messing the whole thing up, then they throw some humiliating low output "high tech" engine in. I'm mostly thinking of the new T-bird here, but I guess the same argument could be applied to a lot of retro cars (PT Cruiser, etc.).
|
|
| #23 |
10-07-2002 @ 09:49:50 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Just sells. Bottom line. They only very rarely stay anywhere near true to the original (GT40) and when they do, they cost an arm and a leg. Like the PT for example- that car is so poorly engineered (no interior room, no cargo space, 150hp engine, no room in the engine compartment) if it wasn't "retro", they wouldn't have sold ANY of 'em.
|
|
| #24 |
10-07-2002 @ 09:51:17 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
At least when they went mildly "retro" on the T/A with the Ram Air hood, they were just adding a simple addition to an already-bad-ass ride.
|
|
| #25 |
10-07-2002 @ 09:51:43 PM |
| Posted By : no1camaro |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#17, now I know your on crack! Camaro always had more balls and the Fire chickin the looks..
when the 30th ann TA( WS6 came out Car & Driver did a show "SS vs 30th Ann TA (WS6) vs Cobra"
the CAMARO SS came in FIRST!!!
the COBRA came in 2nd!!
and your little fire (WS6) chickin came in LAST
so stop talking your shit and move out and draw some skyline fire! hahaha
[Edited by no1camaro on 10-07-2002 @ 09:56:42 PM]
|
|
| #26 |
10-07-2002 @ 09:51:54 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'm mostly embarrassed by the new T-bird. Its styling is too bland because they had to make the design "sleeker" than the original, and its OHC V8 displaces a whopping 3.9L, 100cc more than my V6.
|
|
| #27 |
10-07-2002 @ 09:53:05 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
CORBA? I'm not familiar with that model. The Ford answer to the Handcode, perhaps?
|
|
| #28 |
10-07-2002 @ 09:53:35 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The Camaro weighed a little more, but the T/A looked a hell of a lot better. Take your pick.
|
|
| #29 |
10-07-2002 @ 09:55:30 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#27, Yes, it had a 428CJ left over from the 60's, a C4 transmission, and leather seats from a Lincoln :-)
|
|
| #31 |
10-07-2002 @ 09:58:27 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#25 Always had more what??! MORE WHAT??!! You done went and lost your fuckin' mind. You show me the '67 Camaro that could hang with a '67 Firbird, and I'll show you a car that don't exist. (Oh, wait, the 350 model could hand with the Firebird Sprint 6). And it ain't got any better since. Shit, Firebird had a turbo 6 in '89 that was roastin' 350 Camaros. Do a little research 'fore you go and make yourself look like an ass.
|
|
| #33 |
10-07-2002 @ 10:00:26 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Besides, spanky, ever since GM went chickenshit.....er, umm... corperate, the engines have been identical, anyway.
|
|
| #34 |
10-07-2002 @ 10:00:44 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#31, On 4th gens he's right, an SS does have a slight edge over the T/A Ram Air. Very slight. But yeah, the rest of the gens the T/A has it beat.
|
|
| #35 |
10-07-2002 @ 10:00:46 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
yeah i a think i would need something a little bit tougher then the C4, more like the C6
|
|
| #36 |
10-07-2002 @ 10:01:27 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#31 All except for the infamous Turbo T/A. =)
[Edited by TinIndian on 10-07-2002 @ 10:01:54 PM]
|
|
| #37 |
10-07-2002 @ 10:02:18 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#33, Wow, I think that may be the first time anyone's been called "spanky" on here.
|
|
| #38 |
10-07-2002 @ 10:02:40 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#36, The 305 trubo T/A only suffered from turbo lag that cut it's 1/4mile a bit, in all other areas, it was a fine car, and the 3rd gen Turbos, the ones w/ the Buick engines, those were kick ass
|
|
| #39 |
10-07-2002 @ 10:03:05 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#35, I would say Turbo 400 (what a weirdo tranny) but it's not from the right company.
|
|
| #40 |
10-07-2002 @ 10:03:11 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#34 If that's the case, it's all exhaust and it was an intentional "image" thing. GM has favored Chevy for years. But the engines are the same.
|
Showing page: 2 of 7
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
