Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 98679   By: Skid   Comment: "An interesting assortment. I'm especially intrigue..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "Toured the Charlotte Motor Speedway, ate at the Sp..."
Car: 98677   By: Skid   Comment: "I think '66 is the only year I like the Caprice ro..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the *only* team o..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=13303
Submitted by: TinIndian
Comments: 30  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 10-24-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
This is the '84 Super Duty Fiero that paced Indy. First mid-engine car to do so, it had a trick version of Pontiac's 2.5L "Iron Duke". While the Duke was a 151, the Super Duty was a 163, I believe, at 2.7L And had an hp rating of 232, comapered to the production engine's 92. Versions of the engine had up to 370hp, with some rumored to push 500. I believe the 370hp version was all motor as well.


   Comments

Showing page: 2 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#21
10-24-2002 @ 02:17:29 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
#18 I'm not sure. If so, though, your still not talking a large enough difference to adversly affect handling. the 2.8 was probably up there with the 3.8 (or close) and they handled great, from what I hear.

[Edited by TinIndian on 10-24-2002 @ 02:18:43 PM]


#22
10-24-2002 @ 02:18:09 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
Later, bro.

#23
10-24-2002 @ 02:21:34 PM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
oh yeah last thing, could you spin the wheels on these with the 6 or the 4?

#24
10-24-2002 @ 02:24:49 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
Not too often in the 4, just cuz all the weight's on 'em and thay have good traction. In the 6 I hear you can. And in the one one McMunkee's link at 13304 no fuckin' problem. =)

#25
1-31-2006 @ 07:51:45 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
hehe.

#26
1-31-2006 @ 07:54:52 PM
Posted By : Hoopd87 Reply | Edit | Del
wow this is old.

#27
1-08-2007 @ 02:08:25 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#3, .... The 3.8 isn't a Pontiac engine either.

#28
1-08-2007 @ 02:16:11 AM
Posted By : Altima35se2003 Reply | Edit | Del
92hp aaaaaaaaaahaahaha


no wonder tinindiot loves domestics.


#29
7-18-2010 @ 01:53:05 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
#3, *laughs* By the time the Fiero came out, you weren't going to find a Pontiac engine in much of anything. Pontiac V8s for example were not longer smog-legal in California in the late 70s and were discontinued. And the 3800 V6 is a Buick engine. The 2.8's not a bad engine, nothing to write home about even in "high output" Fiero trim of 140hp (my 6K has roughly the same engine but with a different intake manifold, makes 130 or 135). The Iron Dookie would probably run forever, just not get anywhere fast.

#30
7-18-2010 @ 02:37:34 AM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#29, Corporate engines debuted in 83' I think, and engine "families" inside GM were on the way out well before that.

Heck, even that 78' Grand Prix I just got didn't have a Pontiac motor in it stock, the 301 was an option. Unless you lived in California, then you had to get a 305 Chevy motor optioned in if you wanted a V8. If you bought the base model, you got a buick-built 6 cyl in the 200-something CID range....

And I'm not sure how durable the Duke was, most of those first-gen GM 4 cylinders were all crap, especially the later ones with iron blocks and aluminum heads, they used more HP to eat their own head gaskets than they put to the road.


Showing page: 2 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Wednesday, May 1, 2024 03:58:35 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.