|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
4 |
| Average Score |
3.50 |
| Verdict |
Good
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=16922 |
|
| Comments: 12 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 01-05-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Photoshop/Art |
|
|
Description:
F50 without a wing |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #1 |
1-05-2003 @ 01:38:15 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i think this is one car i would really want a wing on
|
|
| #2 |
1-05-2003 @ 01:40:09 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I dunno, I kinda like the look of this one. Except for the color.
|
|
| #3 |
1-05-2003 @ 02:07:31 PM |
| Posted By : Jon |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It needs the wing, if you were to ever go above say 150mph, the front end would lift off, and one thing would lead to another...
|
|
| #4 |
1-05-2003 @ 02:10:10 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#3, It probably has underbody aero work, like the Enzo. Only race cars need massive downforce, and this really doesn't look like a race car.
|
|
| #5 |
1-05-2003 @ 02:15:42 PM |
| Posted By : Jon |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yea, the under car aero stuff helps smooth out the bottom making it sleeker more aerodynamic, but the wing is what helps keep it to the ground. I read somewhere that an F1 car could race upside down at more than 200mph because the wing makes so much down force, it would stick to the ceiling.
|
|
| #7 |
1-05-2003 @ 02:43:08 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It actually looks surprisingly good without the rear wing, though.
|
|
| #11 |
1-12-2003 @ 06:47:39 PM |
| Posted By : 427 Vette |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, yes because the forum this came from it was said to be a Pshop
[Edited by 427 Vette on 1-12-2003 @ 06:49:06 PM]
|
|
| #12 |
1-12-2003 @ 06:48:53 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, Yeah, it looks sort of blurry around the tail, especially that guy's shorts.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
