|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=19740 |
|
| Comments: 82 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 03-03-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Group |
|
|
Description:
Accord, my T Bird, and a older car possibly a Grand Prix |
Showing page: 3 of 5
[ 1 2 3 4 5 ]
 |
| #47 |
3-03-2003 @ 07:25:51 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
if memory searves you get a lp at 15, with that you can drive to and from work and school without a parent or such, anyplace else requires a parent or gaurdian
|
|
| #48 |
3-03-2003 @ 07:26:57 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
we'll have to wait for comadsampo, hotcamaro or that todd fellow to confirm that though
[Edited by solid_snake on 3-03-2003 @ 07:29:04 PM]
|
|
| #49 |
3-03-2003 @ 07:28:40 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#47, I'm sorry lp requires a parent or gaurdian, restricted liscence allows the back and forth, so it is possible that at 14 you can get a lp but it still doesn't warrent having one's own car
|
|
| #52 |
3-03-2003 @ 07:35:29 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#47, In my state, an LP is only valid w/ a lisenced driver in the car, you get stopped with a LP anywere doing anything without a lisenced driver with you, you're in trouble
[Edited by Low-Tech Redneck on 3-03-2003 @ 07:36:02 PM]
|
|
| #54 |
3-03-2003 @ 08:17:27 PM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Look rrb - Paxton DOES NOT MAKE a roots charger. The SC has an Eaton. The two look completely different and require a different setup. The roots charger is part of the intake.... or in actuality, is the intake. A centrifugal blower sits outside the intake and pushes air through it. They also function completely differently. If you have just a 3.8L thunderbird, that is fine - the SCs are fairly rare - don't try to BS us... we are some fairly experienced car freaks
|
|
| #55 |
3-03-2003 @ 08:19:17 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#54, That's what I've been joking about for a while. The SC had a totally different bottom end, and the heads and intake were specially designed to fit the Eaton M90 on top. To switch over to any centrifugal supercharger would not only be nearly impossible, but counterproductive, because the SC, at over 3600 lbs., really, really needs the low-end torque.
|
|
| #56 |
3-03-2003 @ 08:21:21 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#55, And the only way it could be done would probably involve putting regular 3.8 EFI heads and intake on an SC block, and that would just be pointless--the SC has more HP out of the box than a 3.8 EFI with a centrifugal blower could, and it has more torque.
|
|
| #57 |
3-03-2003 @ 08:27:59 PM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#55, I know... I'm just trying to pound it into rrb's head that we can rarely be faked out...
|
|
| #60 |
3-03-2003 @ 08:30:07 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
If he'd said a Thunderbird with a 5 liter and a Paxton, that would be believable. But why the hell would you put a Paxton on a car that already has a superior forced-unduction system?
|
Showing page: 3 of 5
[ 1 2 3 4 5 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
