|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=21591 |
|
| Comments: 39 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 04-14-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
My friends prelude |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #22 |
4-14-2003 @ 10:16:58 PM |
| Posted By : slow91prelude |
Reply | Edit | Del |
19 yea i thought about that but i didnt want to lose too much accelaration since its only a 135 hp car, i was also used to how it handled with that size and price was a factor too
|
|
| #29 |
4-14-2003 @ 10:21:40 PM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#27, *shudders from memories of cut springs on my friend's 89 CRX*
|
|
| #31 |
4-14-2003 @ 10:24:36 PM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#30, It was 4" from the ground and sparked every time it hit a bump on the freeway.
|
|
| #32 |
4-14-2003 @ 10:25:08 PM |
| Posted By : slow91prelude |
Reply | Edit | Del |
probably coil overs so i can keep it stock ride height for when im driving through the allies of my town, lots of nice places to hit the front off the road
|
|
| #36 |
8-31-2003 @ 03:25:27 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#31, I'll never understand why that's so common--if you're going to lower the vehicle, you have to take the springs out even if you're just going to cut coils off of them. Just spend the darn money and get some stiffer springs while you're at it. Having a car with a lowered stance AND more suspension travel is not a good idea. :-)
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
