|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=23258 |
|
| Comments: 35 (Read/Post) Favorites: 3 (View) |
Submitted
on: 05-27-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Off-topic |
|
|
Description:
Cancer download. |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #23 |
7-19-2003 @ 08:58:08 AM |
| Posted By : AutobahnRacer |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#18, OH...Then it is good for RRB to smoke...
In other words...some ricecops want you to die.
|
|
| #24 |
7-19-2003 @ 09:03:33 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#21, It seems to have affected more than just restaurants, though. For example, the grocery store I work at has also banned smoking in the back breakroom (which used to be exclusively for smokers) and no longer allows employees to smoke anywhere on the premises except in their own cars. (And this has become company policy for all our stores in FL.)
|
|
| #28 |
2-11-2005 @ 04:19:00 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#21, what about the new law in virginia, where somebody can be fined $50 for exposing their underwear in public (walking around with their pants halfway down to their ankles), i think its a great idea, i dont want to look at anybodys underwear in public...its funny because i heard it on a radio station and the dj kept getting calls where people said it was against the constitution or some shit like that, and that they will wear whatever they want to...yeah, ok fags, go ahead and wear your pants halfway off, and then you might as well start pissing in public, and claim that you can do whatever you want because of the constitution, and then you could also maybe wear shirts saying "kill all whites" because its your damn right...http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/02/09/low.pants.ap/
[Edited by ambientFLIER on 2-11-2005 @ 04:21:23 PM]
|
|
| #29 |
2-11-2005 @ 04:24:55 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
"During an extended monologue Monday, he talked about how they dressed or wore their hair in their teens. On Tuesday, he said the measure was an unconstitutional attack on young blacks that would force parents to take off work to accompany their children to court just for making a fashion statement."
-- hahaha, who gives a fuck about them, it is the parent's responsibility first to make sure that their kids dont dress like complete morons, if they have to take off work and beat the shit out of their fashionable kids, then be it...fashion statement my ass, if they want to make a fashion statement they could light themselves on fire
[Edited by ambientFLIER on 2-11-2005 @ 04:25:31 PM]
|
|
| #30 |
2-11-2005 @ 04:34:48 PM |
| Posted By : RyCe_MuNkIe |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I guess i can understand the wearing ur pants down to ur knees thing, but i dont know about the "hair" thing. How do they justify whats over the top and not. Hair is something i think really is a first ammendment right. It's your body, do what you want with it.
|
|
| #33 |
2-11-2005 @ 08:02:59 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I think it looks stupid for someone to wear their pants and purposefully exposing their underwear, but a law against it is even dumber. It's their wardrobe, they should be able to wear it how they want to.
And it's not going to kill you if you see someone's underwear....you see it all the time when you go into a clothing store.
|
|
| #34 |
2-11-2005 @ 08:06:33 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#24, mine is the same, but no one cares, we still smoke out back on the dock and in front of the store
|
|
| #35 |
8-11-2006 @ 05:00:52 PM |
| Posted By : Disrupture |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It's been 4 months since my gf and I haven't touch a cigarette. I feel much better.
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
