|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
Total Votes |
13 |
Average Score |
8.31 |
Verdict |
Bad
|
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=27154 |
|
Comments: 16 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 09-15-2003
|
View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Misc |
|
Description:
Here's an engine shot of the puke green civic that the looser owner claimed to have a blower in. |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
|
#2 |
9-15-2003 @ 03:11:15 PM |
Posted By : fordtacomaz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
oh wait i see it.
VTEC. yep...its the "new turbo" *rolls eyes* |
|
#3 |
9-15-2003 @ 06:25:23 PM |
Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I see a small breadbox... am I missing something? |
|
#4 |
9-15-2003 @ 06:27:07 PM |
Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
small displacement engines actually take a crap load of room - especially with the over-head cams and the associated hardware for the OHC or DOHC cams to work. They are especially 'long' from top to oil-pan. Personally I think a small block is much more compact overall!!! |
|
#5 |
9-15-2003 @ 10:52:51 PM |
Posted By : SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, indeed...which is why I love boxer/rotary engines so much...nice and low... |
|
#6 |
9-16-2003 @ 04:47:11 PM |
Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, what about ohc/dohc small blocks? ford's 4.6? i hear those things are pretty big |
|
#7 |
9-16-2003 @ 04:51:01 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, I think he mistakenly said "smallblock", since most smallblock V8's are OHV.
And yes, the 4.6L Fords (and even worse, the 5.4s) are very large for smallblock V8s; they've got external dimensions approaching that of a big-block, mainly due to the room required for the cam hardware. |
|
#8 |
9-16-2003 @ 04:51:05 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, those aren't small blocks. atleast not to most people. OHC=/=small block |
|
#9 |
9-16-2003 @ 04:54:23 PM |
Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I mean the OHV smallblock is really a compact power package... |
|
#10 |
9-16-2003 @ 05:01:42 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, And it definitely is. Even if I had two more cylinders, I'd still have tons of room around my engine, since my car's engine bay is designed to fit something with OHC. |
|
#11 |
9-27-2003 @ 11:26:23 PM |
Posted By : chuckmuck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
HUM, the section of intake, narrow diamond cross section, middle of bottom edge could an electric fan the amature "tuners" call a hyper-charge. I see 12V lead going to the object. wouldn't do nothing but make the check engine idiot light go on once in a while. |
|
#12 |
9-27-2003 @ 11:35:44 PM |
Posted By : SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
What really sets off this engine's potential is the special breather cap on the camshaft cover. I mean, look at it! That's really high performance. He went to a lot of trouble to install that thing. |
|
#15 |
9-27-2003 @ 11:42:16 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It's rather obvious that the majority of the money spent on this vehicle was used solely for the purpose of making it look like crap. 27148 |
|
#16 |
1-08-2004 @ 07:24:33 PM |
Posted By : V8Tbird |
Reply | Edit | Del |
so this guy did nothing to the engine? Spent $20,000 to make it look like it came out of a goat's butt and left the engine stock. |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|