Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 98677   By: Skid   Comment: "I think '66 is the only year I like the Caprice ro..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the *only* team o..."
Car: 78637   By: DiRF   Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 1
Average Score 10.00
Verdict Bad



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=27346
Submitted by: jugg_al_o
Comments: 58  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 1  (View)
Submitted on: 09-26-2003
View Stats Category: Off-topic
Description:
VOTE REPUBLICAN!


   Comments

Showing page: 2 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]

#21
9-26-2003 @ 12:06:00 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
#19, Also, didn't you read the line "We spend more than most of the rest of the world put together on education and still come in like 27th."

???


#22
9-26-2003 @ 12:06:07 PM
Posted By : jugg_al_o Reply | Edit | Del
ever here of FEDERAL AID dipshit?

#23
9-26-2003 @ 12:07:18 PM
Posted By : jugg_al_o Reply | Edit | Del
we have more students than everybody but China, hence more spending.

#24
9-26-2003 @ 12:10:24 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
So you can't back up your argument, and you've resorted to vulgar namecalling...that will help your case.

"ever here of FEDERAL AID dipshit?:

My reply is still "We (the FEDERAL GOV'T) spend more than most of the rest of the world put together on education and still come in like 27th." Poor city kids can learn just as well if the parents would take part in helping them learn. That just doesn't happen much anymore, parents don't care and a lot don't have very high moral standards. The responsibility of teaching our kids is not the President's, it's the parents'.



#25
9-26-2003 @ 12:11:43 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
#23, We're talking per capita, nice try.

#26
9-26-2003 @ 12:12:14 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#24, How do you define "high moral standards"?

#27
9-26-2003 @ 12:17:41 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
I'll define "low" instead...and how they relate to parenting...

Ignoring your kids (including letting tv babysit them), doing drugs, not teaching them responsibility and values, not making sure what they learn is true (goes along with teaching them right/wrong).

If you sit down and show interest in your kids schoolwork, and teach them a good work ethic through responsibility, any kid no matter how poor can learn and make something of themselves. It doesn't cost money to be a good teacher.




#28
9-26-2003 @ 12:19:22 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
People who blame the government for their child's problems or their own when they haven't done all that they can do to help themselves get no sympathy from me. That's like the women who keep having babies with anyone just to get the bigger welfare check, or people who live on unemployment when they're physically able to work.

#29
9-26-2003 @ 12:20:18 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
That's the problem with the Democrats' way of thinking, "if we give them more money and pay for them to stay in the position they're in, that's great. God forbid they work hard and help themselves."

#30
9-26-2003 @ 12:20:39 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#4, if you don't stop saying libral I'll have to e-slap you :P

#31
9-26-2003 @ 12:21:41 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#30, Liberal. :)

#32
9-26-2003 @ 12:23:12 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
#30, OOH, I'm, scared! :P

Ok, I'll say LEFT, or how about just "WHACKOS". :)

*HEY, THIS IMAGE IS EXPIRED! NOW JUGGY_A-LO IS GONNA SCREAM DISCRIMINATION AND CENSORSHIP!*


#33
9-26-2003 @ 12:26:01 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Honestly, as I've pointed out, I don't like extremists from either camp.

Liberals think that none of us should be wealthier than middle class, that all of our taxes should go toward education and paying already overpaid, dumbass policemen. Also, the fact that there are more black people in prison isn't indicative of the values of modern black culture, but it's a grave injustice, because racial minorities are always less violent than white people. They're just better.

Conservatives on the other hand have this bizarre "Leave it to Beaver" view of "the good old days" before mandatory prayer was taken out of school and people stopped wearing suits and ties to mow their lawn, and that somehow we should go back to those days, even if it means having the government listening in on your phone calls (and if you question that, you aren't a patriot).

[Edited by Skid on 9-26-2003 @ 12:28:33 PM]


#34
9-26-2003 @ 03:01:39 PM
Posted By : kstagger Reply | Edit | Del
#33, uh - so terrorists shouldn't get their phones tapped? Tapping still requires a court order last time I checked.

#35
9-26-2003 @ 03:04:41 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
...and if you're not doing anything wrong, why are you so worried if the government is looking for terrorists.

Freedom isn't necessarily FREE.


#36
9-26-2003 @ 03:15:46 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#35, You did not just say that. One of the most important components of "freedom", in my mind, is the freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. Intrusion into what would normally be considered a reasonable expectation of privacy is a search, and anything they find is a seizure.

Claiming that we shouldn't be worried about getting caught if we aren't doing anything wrong is so incredibly naive it's not even funny.


#37
9-26-2003 @ 03:32:55 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
Not that I'm supporting it, but we all need to cooperate a little and MAYBE make some sacrifices to help put an end to, or at least minimize the terroristic threats we now face. It's not the 1960's where we can all smoke pot and sing about peace, we live in a different era and we need to conduct our lives accordingly. I'm against all-out searches and intrusions, but if you are doing something that looks fishy, you SHOULD be checked out no matter what color you are or what social class you belong to. Not everyone should be a suspect, but all suspects need to be dealt with.

#38
9-26-2003 @ 03:34:21 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
Everyone has this attitude, "I can do what I want and the government has no right to know..."

Well, that was allowed to take place and look where it got us. People flew planes into buildings.


#39
9-26-2003 @ 03:40:17 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#38, I can't help but think that the terrorists have, in a way, already won because they've caused us to compromise our freedoms in the name of securing ourselves against them.

#40
9-26-2003 @ 03:44:06 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#35, you sir are a moron
and we've gone through times with much more terrorist activity


Showing page: 2 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, April 26, 2024 09:53:17 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.