|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=27982 |
|
| Comments: 33 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 10-25-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Misc |
|
|
Description:
show this to all who think Hondas have crappy quality |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #22 |
10-25-2003 @ 07:37:05 PM |
| Posted By : SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Go Saturn! Barely one step ahead of the industry average!
|
|
| #23 |
10-25-2003 @ 07:39:34 PM |
| Posted By : SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Well, they say "Problems per 100 Vehicles," and the lowest is 163, so they're saying that most vehicles out of 100 in the BEST make have 2 problems. I'm guessing they don't mean MAJOR mechanical failures, probably wussy little things like the radio knob coming off or getting a flat tire or who knows what.
|
|
| #24 |
10-25-2003 @ 08:00:41 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
and there lies the problem with this chart, I'd rather have to fix my radio or something a few times than the wheels fall off once
|
|
| #25 |
10-25-2003 @ 08:10:36 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Just as someone said, "problems" can mean almost anything, I'd rather see it charted by serious mechanical problems, not things like faulty interior panels or malfunctioning motors in the windows, etc.
And just how bad is Kia when they lose to a company that's gone bankrupt? (Daewoo)
|
|
| #26 |
10-25-2003 @ 08:56:31 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't go by this J.D. Power crap. For example, Volkswagen is very very low on the list, yet has anyone ever heard of Volkswagen having serious reliability problems? Porsche is high on the list, yet Porsches are known to be everything but reliable.
As for Kia, my mother put 50k on her Sephia with nary a problem. Not saying too much, but people have made Kias out to look like they fall to pieces with just a few miles on them.
|
|
| #28 |
10-28-2003 @ 04:35:21 AM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I just figured out why Volvo is so low on this list. This is after Ford bought them out. So now Ford quality is infecting what used to be superior Volvo quality.
|
|
| #29 |
6-17-2004 @ 09:18:19 AM |
| Posted By : musclecarnut711 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
its appropriate that mercedes rated bad. you pay a lot of $$ for a status symbol. its not that great as a car.
|
|
| #30 |
6-17-2004 @ 09:27:11 AM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#26, guess you never owned a (older) Volkswagon - uber nightmare... many electrical problems
|
|
| #31 |
6-17-2004 @ 09:41:15 AM |
| Posted By : 1990sr20det |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I think most of mistsus problems were anything with the eclipse...
|
|
| #32 |
6-17-2004 @ 09:49:24 AM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#31, the eclipse/talon/laser are supposed to be pretty crappy reliability-wise... dunno, I've never owned one myself.
|
|
| #33 |
6-17-2004 @ 10:54:06 AM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#29, Mercedes used to be at the top of the list in the 80s. see a lot of 80s models on the road
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
