|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=34304 |
|
| Comments: 30 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 07-29-2004
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
0-60 in under 4 seconds, 1/4 mile in under 12 seconds at over 120 mph. No bull.
www.commutercars.com |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #2 |
7-29-2004 @ 11:53:57 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
..and able to tip over in a 5 mph crosswind at speeds above 60..
|
|
| #5 |
7-29-2004 @ 11:58:48 AM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I would be scared to drive this thing on anything but city streets.
|
|
| #6 |
7-29-2004 @ 12:14:09 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
If this could fit this in a XB, you'd have mechanical toast for a toaster, yum yum!
|
|
| #7 |
7-29-2004 @ 12:14:36 PM |
| Posted By : DA_MAISTA |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I like it... somehow. As for its usefulness... no less useful than a pro-street stroked full-blown musclecar.
|
|
| #9 |
7-29-2004 @ 06:17:37 PM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
isn't this that weirdo battery powered 1 man commuter mobile thingy....?
lots of torque with electric motors
|
|
| #11 |
7-30-2004 @ 09:31:11 AM |
| Posted By : V8Tbird |
Reply | Edit | Del |
and very very gay.
#9 is right. I've seen these around before.
|
|
| #13 |
7-30-2004 @ 04:22:21 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
and they are supposedly more stable than normal cars, which i guess is right because all the batteries must be on the floor, and that is pretty much the center of gravity
[Edited by ambientFLIER on 7-30-2004 @ 04:23:14 PM]
|
|
| #14 |
7-30-2004 @ 04:24:57 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
this thing is cool, charges completely in 3 hours, and 30 mins of a gas station ac service, 80-mile range, and all the handling and speed that you could want
|
|
| #15 |
7-30-2004 @ 04:25:36 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
You edited one, so you know how, so use it.
|
|
| #17 |
7-30-2004 @ 05:54:03 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, Yeah...the difference is, one would be cool, and one wouldn't.
|
|
| #19 |
7-30-2004 @ 05:57:43 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Honestly pro streeters and gassers aren't really my thing either...but compared to this? No contest.
|
|
| #20 |
7-30-2004 @ 05:59:44 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
True.
edit: Also, I would like to take this opportunity to state that I love the pro-touring look and don't care if others think it looks too rice-ish (since many of those cars are lowered to an almost idiotic level).
[Edited by Lemming on 7-30-2004 @ 06:00:36 PM]
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
