Ricecop's Rice Or Not?

Latest Comments

Car: Fpost	By: DiRF	Comment: "Now do Classical Gas!..."
Car: 98681	By: DiRF	Comment: "This must have been right around 1979, when the US..."
Car: Fpost	By: DiRF	Comment: "Very nice...."
Car: Fpost	By: Adambomb	Comment: "So, I pre-odered these last August and they finall..."
Car: 98680	By: Skid	Comment: "Neat! I don't know if I've ever seen one of these ..."

See last 25 comments

Go to
Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post

Top 10
Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad

New & Retired
Newest Images Retired Images

Other
Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats

Online Now
1 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List

This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes	61
Average Score	1.46
Verdict	Not Rice

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=45708	Submitted by: Adambomb
Comments: 14 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View)	Submitted on: 10-23-2005
View Stats	Category: Car

Description: '65 Shelby GT350.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]


#1	10-23-2005 @ 09:37:31 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Among the best mustangs ever made.


#2	8-06-2008 @ 10:07:00 AM
Posted By : MxCx	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I dont find early 1st gen Mustangs attractive anymore. runs


#3	8-06-2008 @ 10:39:59 AM
Posted By : Adambomb	Reply \| Edit \| Del
They're one of the most overexposed classics you see everywhere like the 57 Chevies and 55-57 T-Birds, I'll still take a GT350 tho.


#4	8-06-2008 @ 02:16:50 PM
Posted By : 454Nova	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#2, I never did.


#5	8-06-2008 @ 02:20:43 PM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Your collective taste is in your collective ass.


#6	8-06-2008 @ 03:11:44 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Dibs.


#7	8-07-2008 @ 01:55:11 AM
Posted By : MxCx	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#5, Classic doesnt equal pretty.


#8	8-07-2008 @ 02:01:11 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I could say something mean about the attractiveness of early '90s Accords, but I won't.


#9	8-07-2008 @ 02:02:35 AM
Posted By : MxCx	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#8, You are so god damn retarded sometimes. What the flying fuck does my car have to do with anything in this thread? Go yiff yourself.


#10	8-07-2008 @ 02:06:36 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#9, Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, sir. I don't give a shit about your Accord any more than you like my Pontiac. I like my car, you like your car. I like the GT350, you don't. Great for us.


#11	8-07-2008 @ 02:06:58 AM
Posted By : MxCx	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#10, Must be why you brought it up. Im not delusional. Old Accords are boring looking. The only stop looking boring when they become hideously ugly. [Edited by MxCx on 8-07-2008 @ 02:07:37 AM]


#12	8-07-2008 @ 02:14:48 AM
Posted By : Driven_out	Reply \| Edit \| Del
calm down girls.


#13	8-07-2008 @ 04:08:53 AM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#7, No, but 1965 Mustang fastback DOES equal pretty. Differing opinions may be fine and dandy, but actually calling into question the styling of what's universally considered one of the all-time greatest-looking cars ever built? Ballsy, perhaps, but expect derision from others.


#14	8-07-2008 @ 05:40:46 AM
Posted By : MxCx	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#13, The nose is just too stubby for me. I LOVE the 69/70. Comparatively, the 65-68 just dont do it for me. I blew up at yiffy because his comment was about as logical as my ball hair designing the next space shuttle. [Edited by MxCx on 8-07-2008 @ 05:43:08 AM]

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]

Login to leave a comment

	Classifieds
Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Sunday, May 5, 2024 11:18:21 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.