Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 95884   By: Skid   Comment: "The Ibishu Claria is a new favorite...an obvious c..."
Car: 98652   By: Skid   Comment: "Nice...."
Car: 77498   By: DiRF   Comment: "https://youtu.be/KPtECVL-Ljs&t=53..."
Car: 98650   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: ":O awesome..."
Car: 97233   By: DiRF   Comment: "CX-3 joined me on an adventure the past two days. ..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 24
Average Score 2.50
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=47633
Submitted by: 427 Vette
Comments: 27  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 3  (View)
Submitted on: 12-14-2005
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Blue STi.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...STifrontpic.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...BlueSTirear.jpg


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#1
12-15-2005 @ 12:50:18 AM
Posted By : RyCe_MuNkIe Reply | Edit | Del
Hawt

#2
12-15-2005 @ 04:08:37 AM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
Gorgeous.

#3
12-15-2005 @ 12:44:05 PM
Posted By : SuperCivic Reply | Edit | Del
stunningly beautiful.

#4
12-15-2005 @ 01:59:52 PM
Posted By : thontor Reply | Edit | Del
yeah cause we don't see blue STi's very often..


#5
12-15-2005 @ 02:04:34 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
You mean they come in colors other than blue? :P

#6
12-15-2005 @ 07:06:43 PM
Posted By : 89Rettagt Reply | Edit | Del
#5, they shouldnt.

#7
2-11-2006 @ 10:08:59 AM
Posted By : GN Poser Reply | Edit | Del
He's got the right idea with the wing. That looks much better than the stock ricer one. In fact, even the evo wing would look better than the stock sti one, because it doesn't look like a bookshelf as much. Now to put in an fmic and do away with that stupid scoop.

I used to be a subaru freak, but after seeing numerous comparisons between the two where the evo beats out the sti every single time, I think I'm switching sides. Besides, the evo just looks better. Clean and sharp front, and a clean back as well. And if I ever bought an sti, I would have to dyno it, since it seems that it doesn't make the claimed power. How else would an evo with less power, same weight and less displacement beat it in acceleration?

Although I've never driven neither, I love to magazine race. I'm always doing it, because I have no life.


#8
2-11-2006 @ 10:25:31 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#7, dude, you can get those wings stock. AWD cars aren't usually the best for power loss from the engine to the wheels. Anywhoo I think these look better than Evos.

#9
2-12-2006 @ 01:41:23 AM
Posted By : GN Poser Reply | Edit | Del
#8, What are you talking about? No matter if the car is awd, fwd, or rwd, the engine would still make the same power. I was saying that even though it has 300hp, the sti is slower than the 286hp evo with less displacement. And I don't remember tthe sti being available with anything other than the bookshelf ricer wing. Did you even read what I said?

[Edited by GN Poser on 2-12-2006 @ 01:42:09 AM]


#10
2-12-2006 @ 01:42:36 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#9, no. They have both kinds of wings. As for power, drivetrain has NOTHING to do with power, dumbass. Look, fact is, it's slower because it weighs slightly more.

#11
2-12-2006 @ 01:46:06 AM
Posted By : motopsycho Reply | Edit | Del
#9, ambient?

#12
2-12-2006 @ 01:47:55 AM
Posted By : Altima35se2003 Reply | Edit | Del
RRB: Drivetrain has a shitload to do with the APPLICATION of power
GN: SCC's test show the cars to be in an almost dead heat. Both car's wings suck ass in terms of looks. STI's come in other colours, but MOST are blue. I think STI's are better looking but EVO's sound better. And we as North Americans loose out on the best versions of both cars. Europe gets the Ultimate EVOS and UKDM WRX STI PPP LB's, bastards


#13
2-12-2006 @ 01:48:41 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#12, I know it has to do with application of power. He said it had to do with power itself.

#14
2-12-2006 @ 02:12:11 AM
Posted By : GN Poser Reply | Edit | Del
What is all this drivetrain loss mumbo jumbo? All I said is that the sti should be faster than the evo because it has a better power to weight ratio. Yes, it weighs more, but also has more hp. 11.0 lbs/hp for the subaru, and 11.2 lbs/hp for the mitsu. Understand yet?

And I cannot find an option for a low profile wing on the subaru website, nor can I find mention of one anywhere else. It only comes with the bookshelf wing. Educate yourself before posting.

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/d...30/pageId=56897

"Of course, like most cars of its type, there is a big wing on the rear deck, though unlike the STi, it's optional — a "low-profile" spoiler is standard."



#15
2-12-2006 @ 02:13:02 AM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#14, The wing is available on non STis.

#16
2-12-2006 @ 02:13:37 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#15, indeed.

#17
2-12-2006 @ 02:15:01 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
#14, 5.8 seconds to 60 in an STi? those numbers can be achieved by a regular WRX. The STi is at least 1 second quicker to 60.

[Edited by 427 Vette on 2-12-2006 @ 02:17:09 AM]


#18
2-12-2006 @ 02:16:31 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#17, better number can be acheived by a WRX.

#19
2-12-2006 @ 02:17:16 AM
Posted By : GN Poser Reply | Edit | Del
#16, Indeed what? I said that I liked the low-profile wing on the sti, and you said "you can get it stock". Sure, you can get it stock on the wrx...that's not what we're talking about, now is it?

#20
2-12-2006 @ 02:17:33 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#14, Dude, who gives a rat's ass about the wing. And the STi and EVO are so damn close spec wise it's not even funny, you're talking about 13 horsepower and .02 pounds of boost difference. And of course there's gonna be some hp loss from the crank to the wheels.

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 04:58:16 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.