|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
|
#1 |
6-08-2006 @ 11:59:23 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
As a Mustang owner, I would like to say this:
I am glad to see that overweight, nose-heavy pile of crap put in its rightful place. |
|
#3 |
6-09-2006 @ 12:01:58 AM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'm impressed that, with the combination of gearing and weight, they managed to only wrangle a high 12 out of a 500 bhp car. Good job Ford, go team. |
|
#4 |
6-09-2006 @ 12:02:24 AM |
Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'd still choose the Mustang for myself, absurd weight and all. |
|
#5 |
6-09-2006 @ 12:03:08 AM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I think I'll either stick with stupid-modified SN95s, or buy a real car. :p
edit: That said, I still hate Corvettes. As something to drive to work every day, I'd rather have a moped. :p
[Edited by Lemming on 6-09-2006 @ 12:04:07 AM] |
|
#8 |
6-09-2006 @ 01:09:12 PM |
Posted By : 89Rettagt |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i like how they gave points to the mustang for having a back seat. if you have feet you cant use the back seat anyways. |
|
#10 |
6-09-2006 @ 05:54:15 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'd rather have the '68 Corvette 427 they profiled in the same issue.
The '68 Shelby GT500KR would be nice, too, but I wouldn't really want a KR. Too soft. |
|
#11 |
6-10-2006 @ 09:00:47 PM |
Posted By : thontor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
heh, poor foord.. 100 more horsepower than the vette but still loses nearly every performance test.. my question is how did it do better in the lane change test? it's quite a mystery |
|
#12 |
6-10-2006 @ 09:10:37 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, It could have marginally more responsive steering. I would think that steering response is the biggest factor in lane changes. |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|