|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
23 |
| Average Score |
1.52 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=53690 |
|
| Comments: 7 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 07-01-2006
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
The Challenger is a go. I was blindsided by the decision. (sarcasm) |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #2 |
7-01-2006 @ 09:00:47 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'm not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand I think it's the best looking of the lolretrolol "musclecars" but I don't think retro is the way the indusry need to be heading. You can maintain links to the past without trying to remake the past. I think the mustang is a good example of this, three lens tail lights and so forth.
|
|
| #3 |
7-01-2006 @ 09:06:23 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, I agree 100%. I liked the previous generation Mustangs, for example, because they had C-scoops, trapezoidal grilles, 3-bar taillamps, and headlamps that vaguely evoked the design of the original in a couple ways. Did they look anything at all like a '65? Hell no. If you knew anything about Mustang heritage, was it enough to tie it all together? Hell yes.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
