|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
17 |
| Average Score |
2.06 |
| Verdict |
Good
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=6157 |
|
| Comments: 17 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 05-30-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Misc |
|
|
Description:
gotta love these engines |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #3 |
5-30-2002 @ 09:31:56 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Too Bad by Nickelback is on my radio as I'm realding all of you say "Too bad" I saw them in concert on Sept. 11, I did my part not to let the terrorists win. Haha.
|
|
| #4 |
5-30-2002 @ 11:08:57 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Gross. Looks like the cross section of someone's aorta....
|
|
| #5 |
5-30-2002 @ 11:10:07 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
As if the mileage sucks. At least for the power output.
|
|
| #6 |
5-30-2002 @ 01:33:29 PM |
| Posted By : Jesuz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
what's so good about them? they usually leak after 5-10 years and u cant do any thing about it
|
|
| #7 |
5-30-2002 @ 01:43:02 PM |
| Posted By : AtEase |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The good thing would the fact that there aren't any pistons that changes direction.
|
|
| #9 |
5-30-2002 @ 04:08:42 PM |
| Posted By : Asakha |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Well... this is the new one that will be in the RX-8. Suppose to be much better on mileage, dunno yet fot reliability.
|
|
| #10 |
6-28-2002 @ 08:19:28 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah well the old ones are as bad as a worked V8. So some guy over here put a worked V8 in his car instead. But the newer ones arent that bad on fuel.
|
|
| #11 |
3-14-2003 @ 08:08:30 PM |
| Posted By : Five-seveN |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Got me the latest issue of Sports Car International and I must say, the Renesis engine is pretty sweet. It's the same size of the 6 speed manual in the RX8 (!)
|
|
| #13 |
3-14-2003 @ 08:14:43 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, Some would argue that the 13B-REW wasn't so hot at it, either.
Nonetheless, a rotary seems to offer pretty good output for its displacement, even naturally aspirated. It is, however, sort of disappointing that they aren't turbocharging the new RX.
|
|
| #14 |
3-14-2003 @ 08:14:45 PM |
| Posted By : 427 Vette |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, too bad it doesnt make much torque and looks like a chimpmunk
|
|
| #16 |
3-14-2003 @ 08:19:07 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#14, Of course, and this is practically the only time I'll ever say something like this, when you've got an engine that will wind up past 8000 RPM, you don't really need that much torque anyway. It is good, though, if the curve is pretty flat, because if you've got an 8000 RPM motor with a 500 RPM powerband, you aren't getting anywhere fast unless your transmission has more gear ratios than most mountain bikes.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
