|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
0 |
| Average Score |
0.00 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=69638 |
|
| Comments: 49 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 12-27-2007
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Group |
|
|
Description:
Two General Motors lemons that don't live up to their names.
kw: Pontiac LeMans, Hummer H2 |
Showing page: 3 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
 |
| #44 |
12-28-2007 @ 03:03:37 AM |
| Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#19, So it does carry an image? Or it's supposed to?
[Edited by Sensekhmet on 12-28-2007 @ 03:06:21 AM]
|
|
| #45 |
12-28-2007 @ 03:09:15 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#44, The image it carries and the image its supposed to carry are quite dissimilar.
|
|
| #46 |
12-28-2007 @ 03:13:19 AM |
| Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#45, Why? It's supposed to carry the image of the ultimate macho overland vehicle (can you say that?), like the H1 was, and it does, right? Only a small percentage of people view it as a poseur jacked up utility van.
|
|
| #48 |
12-28-2007 @ 03:19:56 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#46, People's popular perception of something and what it actually is can be very different. That's not to say the H2 isn't off-road capable to some degree but I think that the majority of people you ask on the street will say that the H2 is just a tarted up kid-carrier. And I think that even if the H2 was as proven an off-roader as the H1 was people would still think it was said kid-carrier simply because of all the rich suburbanites slapping huge rims on it and using it simply as a status symbol.
|
Showing page: 3 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
