Ricecop's Rice Or Not?

Latest Comments

Car: 95884	By: Skid	Comment: "Someone released Mulholland Drive as a track....11..."
Car: 98674	By: Skid	Comment: "Given the very low point Trans Ams performance was..."
Car: 98675	By: Skid	Comment: "I'm forever on the hunt for the XK140 dropheads th..."
Car: 98673	By: Skid	Comment: "Now THAT is a cool find. I love the British Fords..."
Car: 43287	By: Skid	Comment: "Whoo boy, there's a memory......"

See last 25 comments

Go to
Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post

Top 10
Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad

New & Retired
Newest Images Retired Images

Other
Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats

Online Now
0 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List

View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.

Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=78476	Submitted by: Low-Tech Redneck
Comments: 25 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View)	Submitted on: 05-11-2009
View Stats	Category: Vehicle Misc

Description: The Conquest's new engine going together, a 350 chevy with some very nice Summit aluminum heads, 64cc chambers, that'll make some power.

Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]


#1	5-11-2009 @ 02:52:10 AM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
>:D I'm still eager to see how the whole thing comes together.


#2	5-11-2009 @ 08:37:55 AM
Posted By : 454Nova	Reply \| Edit \| Del
purdy!


#3	5-11-2009 @ 09:17:19 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
was a 2.6 not "sweet" enough for you? Gritboy. Not everything needs a damn 350.


#4	5-11-2009 @ 09:40:41 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#3, Woah. Ok, that's rather unnecessary. Having trouble deducing the tone of your post, but if you're seriously trying to call LTR a gritboy for his choice of replacement engine, I already know whose side I'd take on the issue. Watch it. [Edited by DiRF on 5-11-2009 @ 09:41:41 AM]


#5	5-11-2009 @ 11:11:04 AM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Apparently RRB thinks that anyone who swaps a V8 into a foreign-built car is a "gritboy." This isn't the first time he's said it, and it's getting a little tiresome.


#6	5-11-2009 @ 11:33:32 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
In my opinion, it's not that LTR thinks smallblock V8s are the end-all, be-all to engines... they're just reasonably-priced to build, he obviously has a lot of experience with working on them, and he only swaps them into vehicles whose original engines are already dead.


#7	5-11-2009 @ 11:56:04 AM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#3, If by "sweet" you mean "Spun it's bearings and siezed up" then yes, the Conquests 2.6 isn't sweet enough for me. There's a reason I was able to get the car for $500, it was junk.


#8	5-11-2009 @ 12:19:57 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#5, Foreign? I didn't buy no piece a Jap-Scrap! It's a Mopar! [/Grittboy]


#9	5-11-2009 @ 12:27:51 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#6, Pretty much, you'll note I haven't replaced the motor in the 944 yet and have no plans to do so.


#10	5-11-2009 @ 01:01:22 PM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I'm eager to see more of the project, because I look at it as the sum of its parts....it's a lightweight, RWD, V8-powered sports coupe built on a low budget. What's not to like? While the Conquest may be a sought-after and hard to find RWD platform, the G54B engine itself was not a paragon of reliability, performance, or technological innovation. This is hardly automotive blasphemy.


#11	5-11-2009 @ 05:36:07 PM
Posted By : Obsidian	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#5, Serriously? That riles him up? [Edited by Obsidian on 5-11-2009 @ 05:36:17 PM]


#12	5-11-2009 @ 08:25:38 PM
Posted By : 454Nova	Reply \| Edit \| Del
hey, more power to ya LTR! You've got more than enough actual car work posted here to end any arguments as far as i'm concerned. I say, while you're at it, chuck a small block in the 944 for good measure!


#13	5-11-2009 @ 09:28:38 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Hmm. Not really sure what I think of this build. Since opposition isn't welcome, I think I'll just walk away. I will say this though, certain vehicles are awesome with small-block swaps. Interpret that how you will.


#14	5-11-2009 @ 09:41:08 PM
Posted By : 454Nova	Reply \| Edit \| Del
opposition is ok, the name callin' aint


#15	5-11-2009 @ 10:01:27 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#14, 454 nailed it. If you have another opinion about what kind of engine would be better for a replacement, you're free to express yourself... but belittling someone for deciding on an engine due to their own personal experience, and performance/cost needs, is just completely unwarranted.


#16	5-12-2009 @ 12:37:46 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Every time I look in newest images and see a thumb of a big, beautiful engine sitting in a garage I just know LTR posted it.


#17	5-12-2009 @ 12:38:16 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#3, Waitaminute...it's 2002 again! My time machine worked!!! [Edited by Subourbon187 on 5-12-2009 @ 12:38:33 AM]


#18	5-12-2009 @ 10:31:44 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#17, Wait a minute, Subourban... are you telling me... that you made a time machine... out of a Chrysler Fifth Avenue?!


#19	5-12-2009 @ 10:53:23 AM
Posted By : Adambomb	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#8, furrin boy!


#20	5-13-2009 @ 10:22:26 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I'm not sure what to think about this. Yes, it's great but there is a slight nagging somewhere in my head. Anyway. Will the driveline cope with the torque?

Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]

Login to leave a comment

	Classifieds
Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Friday, April 19, 2024 05:15:38 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.