|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
Total Votes |
906 |
Average Score |
5.40 |
Verdict |
Not Rice
|
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=795 |
|
Comments: 34 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 01-31-2002
|
View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
Description:
this, uh...USED to be a Civic. $100k later, its AEM's new |
Showing page: 2 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
|
#21 |
2-22-2002 @ 06:43:34 PM |
Posted By : ginsu417 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
yeah old beetles were like that, only in the back. just wondering where the hell he got the transmission
|
|
#23 |
2-22-2002 @ 06:45:13 PM |
Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
doubtless custom built, have to be anyway to take the torque load... |
|
#24 |
2-22-2002 @ 06:46:39 PM |
Posted By : LiceLocket420 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I think it's 5WD, there is a hidden wheel beneath the car for extra traction and cornering capabilities |
|
#26 |
2-22-2002 @ 06:56:29 PM |
Posted By : mikesrt |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Front wheel drive just doesnt belong on a drag strip. Its like going ralley racing in a chevelle or something. |
|
#28 |
2-24-2002 @ 12:49:26 AM |
Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
um, mike, rally races used to be chargers and chevelles and mustangs... |
|
#29 |
2-25-2002 @ 05:15:14 PM |
Posted By : mikesrt |
Reply | Edit | Del |
When was the last time anyone seen a chevelle going 100 mph down a mountain side half covered in snow. When the driver was sober I should add. |
|
#31 |
2-25-2002 @ 05:37:54 PM |
Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
There are STILL rallies for those types of cars. I've heard of many rallies which are restricted to '72 and before cars. Besides, why do you think the Mini was revolutionary? Because all its competition was big, rear-wheel-drive cars. And yes, I'm a Ford guy (even though my two favorite NASCAR drivers are Kevin and Jr.) but even I have to admit that the Taurus has no business on a NASCAR track. Actually, NONE of the cars out there now have any business out there, but the Taurus and the Intrepid are the worst. |
|
#32 |
3-10-2002 @ 10:19:32 PM |
Posted By : pluto316 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
YOU BASTARD, IT'S FWD. THERE'S A FWD DIVISION. THEY ARE ALL FWD!! |
|
#33 |
7-05-2002 @ 07:14:51 PM |
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The biggest FWD vehicle ever made was the Olds Toronado, and I believe it had a longitudinaly placed engine as well, it was attached to the transaxle by some odd gearing/drive belt system that is notoriously a headache to repair since it was unique to that vehicle and that vehicle only
[Edited by Low-Tech Redneck on 7-05-2002 @ 07:15:41 PM] |
|
#34 |
7-05-2002 @ 09:11:13 PM |
Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
a lot of those cars were unique to Toronados, including the front shocks. |
Showing page: 2 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|