Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 98682   By: DiRF   Comment: "I just figured they had been...."
Car: 98682   By: Skid   Comment: "I wasn't even aware this was a direct swap, assumi..."
Car: 98682   By: DiRF   Comment: "Taking "Pintostang" to a whole new level. ...I'm ..."
Car: 63801   By: Skid   Comment: "It's a pretty great casting, really. I do enjoy di..."
Car: 63801   By: DiRF   Comment: "Well, apparently, Astros were popular/well-known e..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 479
Average Score 8.81
Verdict Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=7982
Submitted by: Adambomb
Comments: 107  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 07-16-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
rear of 7981


   Comments

Showing page: 2 of 6
[
1 2 3 4 5 6 ]

#21
8-27-2002 @ 12:07:27 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
I hope he didn't think it would look cool. If he did this as anything short of a pathetic joke, he's a threat to our whole social structure and needs to be hung. And stabbed. And burned. And shot. And hung again.

#22
8-27-2002 @ 12:11:21 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
A Sunbird is only as much of a "Pontiac" as an Aztek is, I wouldn't worry bout' it

#23
8-27-2002 @ 12:15:44 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
I think from a conceptual standpoint the Aztek is very Pontiac. They've always (well at least since "Bunkie" took over in the '50s) been about taking chances. I agree that one didn't work well, but if they didn't try they'd be Mopar. Or worse, Ford. I dig the Sunbirds. Granted, they're not powerhouses, but they can be pretty respectable with the 3.1. And they kept convertibles alive when alot of other names gave it up.

#24
8-27-2002 @ 12:22:54 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Well, I think the Aztek/Rezdevous platform was GM's attmept to make a competitor for the Honda CRV and other mini-SUV's out there, and they didn't pull off the styling well at all, I don't hate the Rez, it's interresting, not my style, but doesnt sting the eyes either, but the Aztek is just awfull, and I think the Matrix is eye-bleedingly bad, and it doesn't get better w/ a Pontiac badge, I think the whole vehicle was an attmept to tap into a niche market for hybird car/SUV things, and it didn't work

#25
8-27-2002 @ 12:29:33 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
I certainly think the Aztek would have been much better had they persued the original concept rather than turn it into a Tonka truck with Honda-sized wheels. But it's so rare to see an original concept reach production, especially here in America. I think that's part of the beauty of the Solstice-it's virtually unchanged from the sketch due to time limits. And I actually like the Aztek more than the watered-down Rendezvous. But I think Pontiac could've made a better contender for the Matrix's market without Toyota's help. The Rageous would've been perfect. Typical with Pontiac, 5 years ahead of their time.

#26
8-27-2002 @ 12:36:45 PM
Posted By : Ryan_ Reply | Edit | Del
i have a Rendezvous, well my parents do. They are pretty nice

#27
8-27-2002 @ 12:41:47 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
They're okay, but it's obvious they came ouy after the Aztek. Buick didn't have the stones to try it first.

#28
9-19-2002 @ 04:53:57 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
WOW! Look guys, a new #1 ricer!

#29
9-19-2002 @ 05:02:58 PM
Posted By : no1camaro Reply | Edit | Del
holy sheepshit! this guy is really fucked up in the head!

#30
9-20-2002 @ 08:35:08 AM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
Why does the front shot of the car have such a lower score? It's the same car! 7981

#31
9-25-2002 @ 11:39:54 PM
Posted By : volvogeek Reply | Edit | Del
Dude, I've SEEN this car! I just shook my head as I blew past it in my volvo wagon. ;)

#32
10-17-2002 @ 04:39:17 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
This scares me more every time I see it.

#33
10-17-2002 @ 04:40:37 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
I let some people look at this, they though it was gay....and they where ricers!

#34
10-17-2002 @ 04:44:57 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
I wish it was gay, then it'd have fashion sense. This is just sick.

#35
6-10-2003 @ 08:47:50 AM
Posted By : kstagger Reply | Edit | Del
well, this climbed it's way up to the top 10 again...

#36
7-04-2003 @ 11:33:11 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
[Za] But's it's *very* unique! You guys are just hatin'. I mean, you don't know, it could be fast. [/Za]

#37
7-16-2003 @ 02:30:51 PM
Posted By : Za Reply | Edit | Del
#36, Lol... get off my nuts.

It is unique, even though it's ugly and the person that did this is a complete idiot.

It could be fast, but I'm sure it isn't. It's just plain trash.


#38
7-16-2003 @ 02:51:31 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
HAHAHAHA, it "could be fast".

#39
7-16-2003 @ 02:55:41 PM
Posted By : Za Reply | Edit | Del
#38, It could be fast, yes. You heard me right mr. monkey.

I was being literal, meaning that under the hood, the part that you cannot see, could have a big engine and be fast.

We all know that's not the case though.


[Edited by Za on 7-16-2003 @ 02:56:39 PM]


#40
7-16-2003 @ 02:58:16 PM
Posted By : SmooveB Reply | Edit | Del
#39, even if it had a big engine... its still gonna be damn slow, because when its going over 20mph this car will literally fall apart



Showing page: 2 of 6
[
1 2 3 4 5 6 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Saturday, May 11, 2024 10:46:01 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.