|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
Total Votes |
352 |
Average Score |
7.52 |
Verdict |
Rice
|
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=10203 |
|
Comments: 23 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 08-30-2002
|
View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
Description:
What makes their car so special: It's a classic. If you put my car beside a 2000 Porshe 911 Turbo, I get more looks
|
Showing page: 1 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
|
#2 |
11-27-2002 @ 01:31:43 AM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The kit he has doesn't look to bad, or the wheels. But the paint color, clear corners, the spoiler, and the clear tails HAVE to go. |
|
#4 |
12-02-2002 @ 08:31:53 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i can deal with the paint and clear corners, but yeah, the wing and tails have to go |
|
#5 |
12-02-2002 @ 08:32:09 PM |
Posted By : cool_king_rob |
Reply | Edit | Del |
if he would have left it the stock color it would have looked fine but noooooooooooooooooooo. someone had to get the earl scheib special and wing |
|
#6 |
1-16-2003 @ 10:29:53 PM |
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Agreed, the wing has got to go, then it's tollerable, ditch the clears, and it's likeable |
|
#8 |
1-16-2003 @ 10:34:13 PM |
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, It's not great, but it's no deal killer, life jacket orange is prefferable to nuclear-accident green or blue-man-group-stage-makeup blue..... |
|
#9 |
7-22-2003 @ 03:14:06 PM |
Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
and who considers a car not more than 15 years old a classic anyway? I see these all the time. not saying there's anything wrong with them but I'd definatly look more at a Porsche 911 since I don't see as many of them |
|
#12 |
7-22-2003 @ 03:23:14 PM |
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
25 years for insurance purposes, at least in my state it is. |
|
#13 |
7-22-2003 @ 03:26:41 PM |
Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
no I'm saying that the car is not more than 15 years old. classic is like 25 years old |
|
#14 |
7-22-2003 @ 03:28:31 PM |
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
A CRX won't be considered a classic when it's 50 years old even, I don't know what the owner is smoking. I know that most CRXs will be piles of rust by the time they are 25.
[Edited by mr_mcmunkee on 7-22-2003 @ 03:32:30 PM] |
|
#15 |
7-22-2003 @ 03:29:57 PM |
Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I think the looks are more of the "wtf is that?" than "cool!" |
|
#16 |
7-22-2003 @ 03:31:21 PM |
Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#14, don't you mean that most CRX's WILL be piles of rust by the time their 25 |
|
#17 |
7-22-2003 @ 03:31:41 PM |
Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
RWD sports cars historically become 'classics', while FWD econoboxes are eventually meant for the junkyard. The owner is obviously fooling himself. |
|
#19 |
7-22-2003 @ 03:35:45 PM |
Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
future classics:
g-bodies
5.0 LX and GT Mustangs and SVO's
Vipers
stuff like that |
|
#20 |
12-30-2003 @ 05:08:27 AM |
Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
someone on here was saying that a CRX was of the classic cars to look for in the future along with the SHO and Integra Type R. we dont see too many left in Canada, all the salt and shizz eats the metal to shit in no time flat. THe first thing to go here is the bumper clips. |
Showing page: 1 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|