|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
101 |
| Average Score |
5.37 |
| Verdict |
Good
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=10739 |
|
| Comments: 189 (Read/Post) Favorites: 3 (View) |
Submitted
on: 09-09-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Photoshop/Art |
|
|
Description:
supposebly the new R35, its bad as shit, its gonna be a twin turbo V8 |
Showing page: 4 of 10
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ]
 |
| #61 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:11:04 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Not to mention, isn't the NSX a mid-engine? You can very easily tell by looking at the Vette that it's FR.
|
|
| #63 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:12:41 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The C4 and C5 look mostly the same. And from the front they look very similiar.
|
|
| #65 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:15:02 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#64, Except for the 1896 Ford Quadrocycle! So THERE, Mr. Smartypants, explain that with your test-tubes!
|
|
| #66 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:15:39 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#62 That's all they got right with it. And even then, they probably don't have a transaxle strong enough to get the full potential of the engine. Not that it has alot of torque to take advantage of, anyway.
|
|
| #68 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:16:48 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Oh yeah....well what about the 1792 Cugnot steam tractor??? :P
|
|
| #70 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:21:45 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#69, Bah! That's merely hypothesis! You vacuous, toffee-nosed, stuffy-brained, malodorous pervert! So THERE!
(Edit): And I can't think of one car that's copied a UFO.
[Edited by Skid on 9-12-2002 @ 02:22:32 PM]
|
|
| #72 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:23:34 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#70: Bertone. That's the only reasonable explanations for the things he's done.
|
|
| #75 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:25:59 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#73, LMAO, I was wondering if you'd recognize that line.
|
|
| #76 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:26:43 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Ginsu, no offense, BUT THEY LOOK NOTHING ALIKE! The cab on the NSX is like 2 feet farther forward and the front end looks almost lke a Diablo! Besides, the NSX looks weak! (rather fitting considering it is, but hey) And the 'Vette is ten times more rounded. The NSX is just a stylized box.
|
|
| #77 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:27:48 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The C5 is a design evolution of the C4 Corvette. It might look slightly similar to the NSX (it does't, but I said it might, as in I'm granting you that for the sake of the argument), but that's coincidence. In order to say the C5 copied the NSX, you'd have to say the C4 copied the NSX, and the C4 came out in 1984, about 5 or 6 years prior to the NSX.
|
|
| #78 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:28:18 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
You're mother was a hamster and your father smelled of elderberries!
|
|
| #79 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:28:25 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The way I look at it, everything from the 3rd-generation Corvettes onward had the same basic style, and Chevy just sort of tailored it to the times. The early C4s were a bit boxier than the C3s, and eventually got rounded out towards the end of their life-cycle. Later C4's eventually developed a thinner nose and slightly "rounder" styling cues than the earlier ones. Then, when the C5 restyle happened, it was just a more "aggressive", rounded version of that. If there's a resemblance between the current 'Vette and any other sports car, it's just because Chevy has tried to integrate the styling cues of the time into the same basic shape.
|
|
| #80 |
9-12-2002 @ 02:28:36 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#70: "What? I came here looking for an argument!"
"Oh, I'm sorry! This is Abuse!"
|
Showing page: 4 of 10
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
