|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
209 |
| Average Score |
4.74 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=12234 |
|
| Comments: 24 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 10-06-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Somebody is going to die for this... |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #1 |
10-06-2002 @ 10:10:53 AM |
| Posted By : pureplayinj |
Reply | Edit | Del |
anyone who thinks this car is rice deserves to be smacked in the face
|
|
| #2 |
10-06-2002 @ 10:12:25 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Even with the silly spoiler on the back?
|
|
| #3 |
10-06-2002 @ 10:12:55 AM |
| Posted By : NOSsucks |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The spoiler is why I am mad, otherwise its nice...
|
|
| #7 |
10-06-2002 @ 10:15:53 AM |
| Posted By : NOSsucks |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah, but the car can still be saved... I wouldnt mind one of these for my next car if I could find one in good condition. The Engines had a pretty wide Horsepower range from the factory though, didn't they?
|
|
| #8 |
10-06-2002 @ 01:41:09 PM |
| Posted By : pureplayinj |
Reply | Edit | Del |
bah.. i didnt see the spoiler on the back at first, what the hell? take that off and its a real nice car
|
|
| #9 |
11-16-2002 @ 04:37:31 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I agree, and the horsepower was between 455 and 665, so you guys know!
|
|
| #11 |
11-16-2002 @ 06:41:14 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Weren't these things at the time of the EPA freakout that pretty much killed domestic muscle? I seem to recall that power-wise, the C3 was pretty much the low point of Corvette history.
|
|
| #14 |
1-13-2003 @ 12:20:32 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, I think purists say muscle ended in 72' when the EPA came in and set emissions requirements, the only way they could be met for the next model year was to drop engine compression, and HP numbers fell, the federal govt also required new cars be advertised w/ thier net HP ratings, not gross HP, so the figures fell two fold, in reality and on paper
|
|
| #16 |
7-26-2003 @ 08:55:39 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Why the wing? Why????
And for the record, this is a mid-'70s Corvette, meaning the horsepower would just barely be over 200.
|
|
| #17 |
7-26-2003 @ 08:58:45 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#16, didn't they hit sub 200 at one point? or was that the 80s?
|
|
| #18 |
7-26-2003 @ 09:00:52 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#17, '79-'81 cars (I think those years, I know that it was up until '82) made 190 hp.
And of course, the 6 cylinder models ('53 and '54) were rated at 150 hp.
[Edited by Skid on 7-26-2003 @ 09:01:28 PM]
|
|
| #19 |
10-22-2003 @ 05:34:10 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#16, still I saw one of these smoke a riced out Civic the other night
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
