Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "I don't expire working images. Period...."
Car: Fpost   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "Jesus, DiRF, I at least had one PB account that wa..."
Car: 39354   By: Obsidian   Comment: "You better believe it's fucky. https://www.youtub..."
Car: 89680   By: DiRF   Comment: ""Mr. Peepers" ..."
Car: 39354   By: DiRF   Comment: "Aw, shit... ..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=15585
Submitted by: StillRuns
Comments: 24  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 1  (View)
Submitted on: 12-05-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Cool paint job.


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#1
12-05-2002 @ 09:00:02 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
LTD? Torino? It's some old Ford, my Grandpa had one

#2
12-27-2002 @ 10:16:46 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
beater!

#3
2-16-2003 @ 12:02:14 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Looks like it took a sideswipe, the doors are off anohter car, and the rear quarter is a filler job

#4
4-16-2003 @ 04:41:56 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
#1, LTD

#5
8-18-2004 @ 10:34:43 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
#3, speaking of that how's the model coming?

#6
2-22-2005 @ 06:14:16 AM
Posted By : Hoopd87 Reply | Edit | Del
LTD II

#7
2-22-2005 @ 11:24:20 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Ah yes, the LTD II... these were an evolution of the Torino, IIRC... same car, but slightly different front facia and new name.

#8
2-22-2005 @ 05:12:34 PM
Posted By : Hoopd87 Reply | Edit | Del
From '77-'79. Also on the same platform as the Thunderbird and Cougar. I have a '78 Cougar.

#9
2-22-2005 @ 05:25:42 PM
Posted By : Altima35se2003 Reply | Edit | Del
#8, my friend has a 1973 xr7, mustard yellow on black

#10
2-22-2005 @ 05:26:38 PM
Posted By : Hoopd87 Reply | Edit | Del
mines battleship poogrey and as basic as they came.

#11
2-22-2005 @ 05:27:55 PM
Posted By : Altima35se2003 Reply | Edit | Del
#10, engine?

#12
2-22-2005 @ 05:29:40 PM
Posted By : Hoopd87 Reply | Edit | Del
Stock was a lo-po 302, but that cracked, so It currently has a mo-po 302 from an '85 T-Bird.

#13
2-22-2005 @ 05:33:47 PM
Posted By : Altima35se2003 Reply | Edit | Del
#12, lo-po, like 140hp?

#14
2-22-2005 @ 05:34:24 PM
Posted By : Hoopd87 Reply | Edit | Del
around there, yeah. It *should* have around 170-180, now.

#15
2-22-2005 @ 05:38:12 PM
Posted By : Altima35se2003 Reply | Edit | Del
#14, not to bad, my friend xr7 is pushing about that. Wish he would get off his ass and fix it up.

#16
2-22-2005 @ 05:55:52 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#14, not if its stock, 85 5.0s were only putting out 140, chances are your 79 was putting out more power

#17
2-22-2005 @ 05:58:10 PM
Posted By : Hoopd87 Reply | Edit | Del
From what I heard -and it's been a long time - is that he 302's in the T-birds and Cougars wasn't the same as the lo-po standard issue ones, nor were they HO's.

[Edited by Hoopd87 on 2-22-2005 @ 05:58:58 PM]


#18
2-22-2005 @ 06:06:27 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#17, follow the tech link one the side, it has the year by year specs. 84 was Fords worst power output for a small block. after that it slowly got better, but it still took a few years as you can see by the chart. now given that the 79 mustangs had the 140 crap engine, I would go out on a limb and guess the much larger bird got a bit more. If not then they were the small other then one being carbed and one being CFI

#19
4-01-2005 @ 02:37:17 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
Wow, I love this. I'd fix it up to be in mint condition as far as mechanics go. Of course, some suspension mods would be necessary... also a stick shift. I'd leave the engine pretty much alone (180HP? Enough for me... for now). But the best thing would be this: I would do nothing to the extrerior... it looks simply badass.

#20
5-25-2007 @ 02:15:53 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
Yup, I still love it.

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:22:21 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Ricecop. All rights reserved.