|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=19134 |
|
| Comments: 33 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-19-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Group |
Photoshops of this image:
19188, |
Description:
CRX vs Escort GT |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #21 |
2-19-2003 @ 08:20:56 PM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
boy... those screaming 17 sec 1/4miles... *snore*
|
|
| #22 |
2-19-2003 @ 08:58:04 PM |
| Posted By : AutobahnRacer |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Oh great,A primer gray CRX with POS body kt and S2k Rims.
GO ESCORT!!!!
|
|
| #24 |
2-19-2003 @ 08:59:52 PM |
| Posted By : Kakoriat |
Reply | Edit | Del |
....and then they both torque steered into each other b/c FWD sucks!
|
|
| #25 |
2-19-2003 @ 09:01:16 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Choosing between which of these two cars to root for is like choosing whether you want to be stoned to death or disembowled.
|
|
| #26 |
2-20-2003 @ 08:34:45 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The Escort GT will win easily. The GTs had decent performance, just crappy reliability. It was an Escort though...you can't have everything.
|
|
| #28 |
11-05-2003 @ 01:00:49 PM |
| Posted By : 91TSI |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I once owned an escort. What's sad is I can't imagine it beating anything. It was horribly slow. And I know it would stomp that crx. And people actually spend money to rice CRX's? WHY?!?!
|
|
| #29 |
1-16-2004 @ 02:14:51 AM |
| Posted By : V8Tbird |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Nither of them are fast. Get over it. Go home. Buy a Mustang.
|
|
| #33 |
11-04-2004 @ 07:14:35 PM |
| Posted By : OldSchoolSpeed |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#27, that blurry gimp in between seems to be the same guy who is starting the race between the Ford Ranger and whatever else it's racing. both pictures were probably shot on a friday night street race on Kearney Mesa Blvd.
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
